Why does the CAPTCHA thing always have to be about who's too "macho" to complain? Stupid. There are lots of rational reasons to question CAPTCHA–including lack of transparency in instituting it wo consulting anons. Ridiculing those who oppose it – or calling us SHILLS – does nothing by division-fag.
'''MSM never talks about QResearch only "Q followers"
Just realized something last night. I collect all the MSM articles written about Q/Qmovement, about 700 so far. They are close to 100% negative. We know that.
But here's what's interesting. The focus is ALWAYS on one of two things: (a) 8chan as a hotbed of crazy radicalism or (b) Q movement as a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists.
As far as I know, NOT ONE ARTICLE talks about the fact that QResearch collects the news and compiles it in the Notes. NOT ONE. We have a 24/7 hour news compilation service (and well as analytical pieces) that is being completely ignored by the MSM, even though it's a major source of info for people who spread the word about Q on social media.
Moar ridicule. Alinsky not a good model for anons, IMO. Why not argue with logic, anon? What are the well-reasoned arguments that support your position. Actually, what IS your position? Pro-Captcha, but why? You didn't say.
Totally agree that anyone can say anything here. Yeah, they can call me a pussy, no problem. But wouldn't it be moar productive to have an intelligent discussion of the issues involved? Isn't that what QResearch is for?
No one knows the answer about why we have captcha, just theories. That's why it's being argued about in every bread. Go back to Bye Bye RR Edition last Monday eve to see when it first appeared. #8139
>I want five moar captcha's to keep faggots like you crying over it
Why? What do you want "faggots like me to cry about it? I understand if you're a shill, it's your job. But if you're an anon, why would you want to shit on other other anons? You have no idea what the person you're addressing has or has not contributed to this board, to this effort. You assume you know, but you don't. Only fools rely on ad hominem attacks instead of facts and logic.
Use facts and logic to argue your points. Or at least more witty memes. I mean, can't you bring something a little better to the table?