Hmmm
>>6373120
>Did Rogers have more to tell him about than illegal surveillance, something one pressing which made Trump move his Transition Team out of NYC?
>
I'm all ears if you have more than this. Hard to follow a cold dead trail
Hannigan links to Huwaei
You know the Robert Hannigan of GCHQ fame.
That Hannigan
Well, from these 3rd party, cocktail napkin version of events acurately portrays the IRL events, Side Show Bob is dumber than a box of rocks because the actions hinted at are crimes. Blatant crimes. So I doubt this is quite so cut and dried.
My guess is that Side Show Bob and team would like the Indictment against the Russian firms to go away. That would pave the way for all the dirt/half truths/false witness statements/pie in the sky speculation to be released. But S.S.B. can't drop the case, even though he knows it will never get to trial, because that would paint a great big target/"Question Mark" on everything released. It would also add fuel to the theory that SSB indicted these companies purely for "OPTICS". Highlighting the dropping of that indictment, when the false narrative of Russian hacking/influence peddling in the election is becoming quite thread bear would back fire on them. It would also stengthen the case that the sole backing for the illegal FISA's is the Steele Dossier.
So, long story short, if the maxi penalty for SSB doing what is hinted at is contempt of court, while creating an escape route for the accused "Russian Bot Farms", then I suspect that would be the best way to break the confidentiallity seal.
If there is anything to the speculation anons have described, then Side Show Bob or his minions have a big smoke bomb in there they want out sooner rather than later.
Just me blowing smoke.