Incorrect - gravity is simply incoherent magnetism. Like your view on what gravity is.
It is NOT a stand-alone and dominant force governing the cosmos.
You say surface tension of fields.
Define field. Fields of what?
You haven't defined field. Field of what?
You cannot use an attribute or behaviour (what something does), to explain what something is. That is simply describing a phenomena - not a thing.
Would it blow your mind, if I told you that there was no such 'thing' as mass or charge, in the truest logical analysis?
When the foundations are flawed…..lots of things that science is uncovering that does not meet theoretical work or abstract math 'predictions'.
Higgs Schmiggs.
Sound experiments are repeatable with some degree of reliability.
Seeing 'something' once or twice in 2 or 3 trillion collisions is solid evidence of precisely nothing.
'Mass' is location specific. Outisde of what orthodoxy calls a gravitational field, mass disappears. So, do all those Higgs boson particles come raining back down to earth?
No.
Because quantum sciences are the very definition if a cult for the insane and intellectually bereft.
The Michelson-Morley experiment did not disprove the ether.
It exists.
It is the distriurbance of that which creates the forces we've been driving ourselves nuts trying to unify, thinking they were different.
They are not. Foiur faces of the same thing - ether perturbation.
Light, (Die)electric), Magentic, Gravity. They are attributes of ether distrubance, NOT independent forces.
Light never travels - it is inducted in a coaxial circuity, we wrong interpret as a wave particle duality.
Circuit is longitudinal pulses, and transverse waveforms. So much our scientist screwed up on, for the sake of simple ego and livelihood….
I'm glad to see awareness of his work is increasing.
This guy Wheeler confounds the newby, but he knows his shit.
Counterspace, ether……it ain't in any location you can measure.
Orthodox Science in the modern era is the religion of measurment.