nice copy pasta
blood libel is a conspiracy? It's historically proven. You shills have to forget your so easy to spot when you're jerking each others posts off
The torah doesn't specifically ban human blood. It bans all animal blood. Human blood becomes forbidden once it has left the body. It is permitted to suck the blood out of a wound on a finger and such to some jews.
https://www.yeshiva.co/ask/?id=5984
Just in case you won't read the link like a good little jew, here's the quote from the Jews themselves.
https://www.yeshiva.co/ask/?id=5984
Thank you for your interesting question. The Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh De'ah 66,10) states that human blood, after it has left the body, is forbidden.
>This is not because the human blood itself is forbidden to us from the Torah, but rather because someone might think mistakenly that it was non-human blood and therefore forbidden (this type of law is called "marit aiyin").
So, if one bites an apple and finds that blood has come out of one's gums onto the apple, the blood spots must be removed from the apple before taking the next bite. However, continues the Shulchan Aruch, blood inside one's mouth is allowed, and so if one has bit their cheek, or has bleeding gums, the blood inside the mouth may be swallowed, and one does not need to spit it out.
Nice deflection prove me wrong faggot.
Better go to your local lodge and start sucking off masons.