Didn't find this in the Notables. Sorry if posted already.

Noticed this piece of news only now, even though article is from 10:45 this morning.

They're indeed going after the people with a potential to influence large groups w/ respect to the coming elections.

Another kind of "election interference"?

>>6414400

I was late to the party anyways. So, sorry for posting old news.

But it would seem the anon is right:

>>6414410

Last post is from 04/19 – quite a long time for one of our highest ranking anons not to tweet.

>>6414538

That's weird. Wonder how they do that, if it's a completely new clip.

Don't use twatter myself, nor fb or anything else.

Thinking about it, maybe that was one reason for making us here "the news" ….

Even though fb & twatter likely still have a much larger reach than /qr/.

At any rate, I still see this strategy of banning conservative voices backfire magnificently – these people are stupid. Kek!

>>6414658

Keep posting 'em here.

I'm sure other anons (sounds like you are likely on some "special watch list") will post them.