>>6417011 pb
https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1124868564220096515?s=19
I can't watch that.
Something is hidden in plain site / sight:
-
It is not understood.
-
It is not believed
-
Another, but false "truth" is projected upon it, and distracts
4 It's looked at but not seen
I prefer the captchas and the slower bread.
Won't stop the real researchers? but maybe the chit-chatters?
Takes time to pull material together.
"thinking takes time"
The bread went by so fast before I missed a lot.
I love it so far.
I'm sorry for the folks who hunt an peck on the keyboard. Can't be easy.
liar
He was being framed or ? by Andy McCabe
"In the wake of the Trump Tower wiretapping allegations, Klayman on Montgomery's behalf claimed that Montgomery had evidence that security agencies have been involved in "systematic illegal surveillance on prominent Americans", including Donald Trump. Jerome Corsi and Mike Zullo, "
the wiki on him labels him a fraud
But he was correct about the surveillance
Can't believe Wiki anyway; not a good source.
He had a lawyer who called him a con? The lawyer's name was Michael J. Flynn.
Are you hinting he was Sgt. Pepper?
67 - 20 = 47
est. of C-A ?
"20 years ago today
Sgt. Pepper taught the band to play"
?
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill, KG, OM, CH, TD, DL, FRS, RA (30 November 1874 – 24 January 1965)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_Churchill
"knowingly" to lie
leaves them open to charges of libel; it's one of the conditions.
Seems like POTUS is thinking of suing them
?
When I went to find the tweet of today which refer obliquely to the "trouble" they are in for what they are doing [censorship of James W..] I couldn't find the tweet on POTUS twitter feed. But it was there in the Q research back up .
I couldn't find it since it was DJT's personal twitter; not POTUS.
Sorry
Weird Q research archive has realdonaldtrump and not POTUS tweets..
I know that but separate from that the Media outlets are open to being sued for Libel.
There may be criminal charges related to treason or sedition. But in a Civil Sense, he could sue them for $$$ / damages and potentially put them out of business?