>>6417427, >>6417451, >>6417571 (LB)

"Knowingly"

AFAIK, knowingly is a qualifier for valid government prior restraint claims wrt the 1st Amendment. One can not knowingly lie in an attempt to undermine the government and expect 1st amendment protection. The government can exert that level of censorship.

That was the basis of the, 'yelling fire in a crowded theater", SCOTUS argument. It's not protected speech if the person knows there is no fire.

It's a very blurry and controversial line, but POTUS seems to be confident it will hold up in this case, If so, a lot of people going to be fucked. They were warned.

>>6417960

Not so sure the AfD is trusted by Germans who are dissatisfied, laying low, and keeping their mouth shut. There are the Freie Wähler candidates that I would bet on . Freie Wähler translates out as "Free Voters", but means more like what we call Independents; not attached to any particular political party or social level. IOW, unattached (to a party or ideology) voters. I think most protest votes will go that direction.