Anonymous ID: 9adfa4 March 12, 2018, 2:13 p.m. No.642821   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2829 >>2870 >>3130 >>3142 >>3238

Anons

I STRONGLY suggest reading breads

 

786: https:// 8ch.net/qresearch/res/635619.html

787: https:// 8ch.net/qresearch/res/636367.html

788: https:// 8ch.net/qresearch/res/637178.html

 

from last night.

 

I don't want to say too much, but pay attention to the IDs.

 

Tons of good, reliable information.

 

A small tease:

Did you know George Washington was NOT the first President of the United States?

 

Meet Peyton Randolph.

http:// www. peytonrandolph.com/

 

This and a lot more information is in those breads. One of the most productive nights we've ever had.

 

Godspeed.

Anonymous ID: 9adfa4 March 12, 2018, 2:37 p.m. No.643010   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3032 >>3115 >>3214

>>642902

Also, what does he mean we went too deep?

I believe Q meant they went too deep down the rabbit hole, too fast (with us). Meaning the crumbs dropped, we weren't ready for. We didn't make the connections they wanted us to. Also this risks people discrediting us with a conspiracy label.

 

Does he mean us including him, or the Q team?

Q Team knows all, there is no "too deep" for them. They don't sleep, because of what they know.

 

What happened during the strength test?

'It seems to be a server stress test. To make sure that when the white hats host/broadcast future speeches (that will likely include important comms), to bypass corrupt MSM/censorship, the technical parts/servers will be able to handle the load."

Anonymous ID: 9adfa4 March 12, 2018, 3:02 p.m. No.643249   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3379

>>643214

Thank you.

I disagree (but could have missed something), but I don't think we were the ones calling it conspiracy theory.

I think our inability to properly, or quickly connect what N was, showed there was a gap that we weren't filling. Which could/would risk others calling us/Q conspiracy theorists. Which MSM has already shown as heir first moves.

 

Q insisting we build the proofs, also supports this theory.

 

Not trying to split hairs with you anon, just wanted to clarify. I don't know I am correct.

 

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: 9adfa4 March 12, 2018, 3:09 p.m. No.643318   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3374 >>3377

>>643295

Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.