Guys, I want your help digging. I was talking to my girlfriend about Epstein's Lolita Express and she mentioned that there is a book about a professor who falls in love with a teenage girl. I had never heard of it but decided to look it up and I began reading the first page of the novel.

https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/234330/mod_resource/content/1/Vladimir%20Nabokov%20Lolita%20Penguin%20Modern%20Classics%20%202000%20(1).pdf

'Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta.She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock. She was Lola in slacks. She was Dolly at school. She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita.Did she have a precursor? She did, indeed she did. In point of fact, there might have been no Lolita at all had I not loved, one summer, a certain initial girl-child. In a princedom by the sea. Oh when? About as many years before Lo-lita was born as my age was that summer. You can always count on a murderer for a fancy prose style. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, exhibit number one is what the seraphs, the mis-informed, simple, noble-winged seraphs, envied. Look at this tangle of thorns.'

I have read plenty about Alice in Wonderland being symbolic of their pedophilia debaucheries. Could this be Epstein's own guide, the "how to?" of this sickness? I don't have the time right now to research this right now. I laid out my premise, and would just like to add that perhaps it is not an owl or bird that perches on the temple on that island, but a seraphim. A fallen angel symbolically guarding the place where children are raped. These people are sick. These people are fucking sick. Help me decode further.