Hello famefag shitbaker.
Breads up for whoever wants to take it, if nobody wants to take it, let shitbaker bake until they don't include important notables like this - >>6429697
>so you insult the baker because you have a different opinion of what should be or shouldn't be a notable…
>Unironically defending famefagging.
Nice. This is why nobody takes you seriously.
Does anybody think we can get him to cry on camera?
>my comment was constructive critisism works better than insults
I thought it was more along the lines of
>The mean BV is saying bakers cant be famefags
That's what is sounds like to me.
>thanks for confirming who you are
That doesn't require real rocket science.
>I didn't realize that the YT anon and the baker anon were working together or are one and the same person.
Then why are you commenting?