Proposing, for community consideration, an inflammatory hypothesis about the biggest puzzle piece, Q’s identity:

James Comey is the key, predominant individual behind Q and he has been deliberately leaving bread crumbs and “leaking” signals to encourage anons to track and unmask him.

Completely accept that 99.999% of anons will immediately dismiss the above view as ludicrous because it is almost obscenely contrarian/counter-narrative, bordering on being insane. Not an issue; working to build and then post, in the next few days, a strong enough case to tip community opinion toward acceptance by 10% of anons, enough to ensure future traction.

The post series that follows provides a basic outline of the forthcoming case, but it is still quite lengthy. Deeply appreciate the few true, diligent anons who will take the time to carefully read and work to understand, despite the festival of autism found in these messages; trying to convey a complex, novel perspective, but one believed to eventually become valued by the Q community. Stim-seeking, easily bored anons, especially those who know they have the patience of hummingbirds on crack, are thanked for their initial interest, but advised to scroll on to the next boob post, which will better meet their needs than this message chain.

1/10

>>6433486

(a) Q’s posts show evidence of deliberate, careful and consistent use of very specific visual imagery (see attached image of just a sample of Q’s visual motif variants) that can be grouped and generically conceptualized as approx. 5 basic visual shapes/patterns, which then comprise Q’s visual pattern signature. (Consider some of the hints at visually representing information: “Lordy, I hope there are pictures” – James Comey / “Paint the picture” - Q).

(b) Once the shapes/visual patterns are seen it is possible to work backward from how these shapes were hinted at or alluded to in Q’s drops (the strategies Q applied) to successfully profile the real world personal and cultural background of an author who would find certain particular types of symbol hints and allusions to be meaningful. Allowing for multiple Q drop authors, the most generic profile that best fits the major elements of Q’s messages is a white male, likely 50+, upper-middle class, university educated with hints of East Coast / Ivy League social peer group affiliation, demonstrating extensive legal and upper FBI experience. Drops use a precise, clipped writing style common to time-crunched executives managing market-leading national corporations. Anon realizes such a proposed profile seems outlandishly multifaceted yet oddly specific, but, as an example, consider how much of the population you can eliminate as a suspect for being Q knowing Q considers theatre (i.e. plays, musicals, etc.) to be sufficiently familiar to the broad, general public as normative, popular entertainment to use elements from it to hint at particular symbols.

2/10

>>6433504

(c) Armed with a profile, one can then do a targeted search for potential candidates for Q. The most obvious upper- level FBI match is James Comey. His public behavior would lead one to pre-emptively reject him as a candidate, except…. once he is plugged in as Q then clusters of formerly odd, vague or confusing information “click” into place and patterns of data make unique sense or have added importance/relevance. Some minor examples:

(i) October 28th, 1977 – James Comey and his brother Peter are confronted at gunpoint by the “Ramsey rapist”.

October 28th, 2016 – James Comey sends a controversial letter to Congress about re-opening the Clinton email case.

October 28th, 2017 – First post from Q, referencing Clinton, launches public Q community investigation/inquiry.

Merely a coincidence ? Or, for James Comey, is October 28th almost ritualistically significant as a day on which to successfully confront evil?

(ii) On March 29, 2017, while speaking at the Intelligence and National Security Alliance Leadership dinner, Comey, even with elite FBI training, evidently compromises his opsec and gives enough specific details for “journalist” Ashley Feinberg to publically identify his personal, anonymous Twitter and Instagram accounts.

https://gizmodo.com/this-is-almost-certainly-james-comey-s-twitter-account-1793843641

Really? Journalist outwits careless FBI director? Believable? Or did Comey have a pressing reason to stop being an anon, while generating widespread public awareness through the media that he had verified social media accounts. If Comey has dropped crumbs to enable him to be unmasked from anon status in the past, could Comey be doing the same thing again, if he is a big part of Q?

At this same dinner event, which set into motion the discovery of his social media accounts, the following comment by Comey was made, but not grasped for its importance at the time:

“I know that when I make a hard decision, a storm is going to follow," Comey said at the Intelligence and National Security Alliance Leadership dinner. "Honestly, I don't care."

https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/29/politics/james-comey-fbi/index.html

(iii) Comey’s Twitter feed consists of one post from March 30 2017, alluding to the discovery that the account belongs to him. Suddenly, after virtual non-use, on October 18th, 2017 Comey begins regularly tweeting, to date carefully curating both an online presence and a minimally expanding Twitter feed, all initiated shortly before Q’s first post appeared on October 28, 2017.

3/10

>>6433521

(d) Knowledge of Q’s symbol signature (image of some Q visual motifs attached) can be applied to Comey’s Twitter feed to confirm that he makes allusions to the same visual symbols as Q. In fact, he starts displaying Q’s eventual basic, signature visual symbol “language” on Tweets that pre-date Q’s first post.

For example, there is a slightly enigmatic cluster of posts, pre-dating the appearance of Q, from October 20, 22 and 23, which have repeated emphasis of Comey’s tweet location being Iowa. The central post of the three, on the 22nd, shows pelicans flying in a V formation. Why? Possibly, to obliquely reference a particular visual image: <<>>. a guillemet, which is uniquely associated with Iowa:

“Iowans make use of the guillemet when quoting text that also contains a quote, especially in the Des Moines metropolitan region. E.g. « The governor answered "I am thankful for those Iowans who have stepped forward to serve their fellow citizens." ». This practice – a local shibboleth – is a variation of the French usage and dates back to use by the newspaper Iowa Star (now the Des Moines Register)”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillemet

Consulting the attached image of Q visual motifs shows that Q repeatedly makes use of imagery variants based on successive brackets – ((())) and Comey’s <<>would not be out of place.

4/10

>>6433535

It is possible to examine additional, odd or cryptic Comey tweets and realize he is alluding to the same basic ((())) visual symbol. Some examples:

(i) November 10th 2017 tweet of onion rings and a cosmo in a unique glass which features expanding, successive rings of color.

(ii) June 16th 2018 tweet of himself in Iowa standing in a farm field, the growing vegetation forming successive brackets – (((( - around where he stands.

(iii) March 23rd 2018 tweet vaguely noting “Geologic time offers useful perspective”. See the attached visual representation of geologic time; it consists of partial circle segments, i.e. ( ) imagery.

One can even examine videos of his public testimony to verify Comey strongly orients to concepts through a visual/spatial modality. Note at 2:15:40 his gesture for “echoes”/((())) that sees him gesticulate using both his hands simultaneously, hands cupped as partial semi-circles and moving in a successive, outward radiating pattern that follows the ((())) motif: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixOguUCVp8k

5/10

>>6433563

Unconvinced? Consider the possible basic visual shape underlying and unifying this cluster of repeated Q imagery: WITCH (hunt), WIZARDS (and warlocks), “these people are stupid” (dunce cap), unicorn, pyramid, pray (praying hand shape), Titanic (ship on movie poster), Godfather 3 (hands on movie poster), “Impressive, most impressive” (Darth Vader – triangular section of front faceplate), mountain…etc.

Solution for common unifying shape for the above: Triangle.

So, given Q reinforcing through repetition allusions to this basic triangle shape, is Comey’s June 15, 2018 tweet (attached) just oddly quirky or a deliberate and intentional signal? (Q30: “I can hint and point but…”).

6/10

>>6433584

(e) Once Q’s visual symbols are known, it becomes evident that the WH is choosing to use, reinforce and confirm the same visual shapes to authenticate association with Q. For obvious examples of the ((())) motif consider some headers of President Trump’s Twitter accounts – the former Real Donald Trump header shows a <made by the two sets of stairs on either side & the current header has the Army Black Knights configured in roughly 4 lines of staggered )))) waves. The POTUS account displays a )))) expanding outward from the podium where President Trump is speaking. Consider the attached image of the visual representation of the Kentucky Derby, a recent POTUS tweet topic.

7/10

>>6433596

(f) If one plugs James Comey in as a predominant contributor to Q, then elements in Q’s drops have increased significance/richer levels of explanation:

(i) multiple posts focused on patriot/traitor duality.

(ii) Q’s purported access to Comey’s Gmail (Q1912)

(iii) Q’s certainty that the Comey memos are fake (Q1190)

(iv) Q4 focusing on Gowdy’s comments on Comey (history will…) – Gowdy: [regarding Comey] History will be a hell of a lot kinder to him than the Democrats were…” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Y1r3yON-QA

(v) Mueller being considered by Q as an installed blockade, which was actually set in motion due to Comey indirectly “leaking” his memo contents to trigger appointment of a special counsel. But who was actually blocked? Doesn’t Q imply it was POTUS and his team? Yet, another answer is possible: the compromised FBI chain of command leading the Russia/obstruction investigation was reported, by the media, as blindsided and boxed out by Mueller’s sudden appointment:

“The special counsel probe, in essence, took away control of the investigation from the FBI under Acting Director McCabe and placed it in the hands of Mueller.

This was confirmed by the DOJ in a statement last month that read, “The deputy attorney general in fact appointed special counsel Robert Mueller, and directed that Mr. McCabe be removed from any participation in that investigation.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/conclusion-of-special-counsel-probe-puts-focus-on-origin-of-fbis-investigation_2851193.html

(vi) the frequency of repeated Q drops targeting Comey with personal animus (eg. Q2805), but specifically Q1912 where Q notes that, regarding Comey, his “resist OP will not provide enough public support for cover”. Q128 notes: “What is a legend? Why is a legend useful?”. A legend is an FBI term for “a cover story, including documentation” related to the fictional biography or background of an undercover FBI agent [http://cobweb.scarymonsters.net/~corleyj/truth/fbiterms.html]. Comey attacks himself as Q to strengthen public perception of the legitimacy of his resist! cover persona, among both Ds and Rs.

(vii) the vulnerable and alarming Q1746: “WE ARE UNDER THREAT OF KILL EVERY SECOND OF THE DAY”.

(viii) the word play of Q2562 referencing “going public”: “COME[Y]” – unpacked as: Comey? [Y]es.

8/10

>>6433609

(g) Anon acknowledges that the perspective proposed could be viewed as too outrageous – yet,…“wait until you learn who has been talking to you here” Q918 - but it solves the puzzle of why Comey - in contrast to Lynch, Brennan, Clapper, Clinton, etc. - is not more curtailed in his action by POTUS, who Q affirms is in control, or even why Comey is not forced into a reduced public profile like the others. Comey remains in play on the board, making very public moves that trigger countermoves by Team POTUS. Comey is deliberately attracting mass social attention to himself, to keep himself (alive) in the public spotlight, while occasionally “accidentally” acting cooperatively with POTUS, from the “opposition side”, to direct and orient the course of events toward an outcome of justice and eventual public awakening. Think of two performing, collaborative opponents, the pop culture Kabuki theatre of such scenarios as pro-wrestling or the Harlem Globetrotters vs. Washington Generals.

Replace categorizing James Comey as corrupt or compromised and instead envision someone who faced intense centralized, interlocking institutional opposition that constricted his range of viable action. He was compelled to repeatedly make gun-to-the-head choices, forced to select from his limited, available options under constraining circumstances. Specifically, he was boxed in on three sides by a corrupt DOJ, a compromised or co-opted FBI subordinate chain of command and had trash intel, laundered through Brennan and Clapper, injected into the FBI to steer and manipulate their investigative conduct toward a particular, desired outcome. Though likely furious at his institution being hijacked and its reputation tarnished, Comey was locked out of viable action due to those in power in the hierarchy around him.

And then a miracle happened… she lost.

Corrupt government actors could now be removed or replaced and all of Comey’s careful prior efforts to avoid fruitlessly prosecuting Clinton in a compromised legal environment would at last yield justice. Preposterous? Just consider….we know a great deal about the actions of shady elements within the FBI through uncovered and publicaly disclosed internal FBI documentation, but who had access to first examine or search for this evidence? Who would ultimately have been in a position to quietly initiate, authorize or oversee surveillance or investigation of suspect “FBI” conduct?

When did the isolated chain of corrupt FBI investigative hunters become the hunted? How soon did Comey, like the NSA before him, come to know the FBI had a Clown infestation? Did he institute countermeasures? Would he choose to seek out Admiral Rogers for help?

9/10

>>6433624

Just asking anons to entertain the possibility of a complete community misread on Comey…

March 17th, 2018 James Comey, of documented Irish heritage, tweets: “Mr. President, the American people will hear my story very soon. And they can judge for themselves who is honorable and who is not”.

Decode:

March (Madness) – brackets ((()))

17th – Q

St. Patrick’s Day – James Brien Comey (Irish heritage)

How many coincidences….before “we the FBI now” is no longer a chan meme for at least some anons here?

Contrast to Q3097 from March 17th, 2019: “What day is today? How much more obvious can we make it?”.

Comey has a live CNN Town Hall May 9th. No expectation of a public Comey “face turn” until the time is deemed right, but at least one anon will be tuning in; anything could happen on a live CNN broadcast, even an interesting coincidence or two…

(Shout out to any Feds in the Bread; a fixated anon making sustained, wild, reality-free claims about a former FBI Director in a public online forum probably earns one a comfy place on the deluxe watchlist).

10/10