>The guy who twatted code to kill the President?
Anon imagination of code to kill the President. Don't assume
some anonymous "decode" counts as proof of anyting. Seriously anon,
I'd expect better after all this time. SMDH.
Still don't know where anybody gets this "fixer for Clinton" nonsense.
He literally cost her the election. Don't be this ignorant of history.
Stop making up your own.
Two different things. DiGenova said there was a Comey report due this week,
which I believe is a separate issue from the memo filing.
Hell, her bewbs are pretty old. They may need a tune up, or some more air in the tires at least.
>Weren't we told Comey was first
No, we were told C before D, without any indication of what that meant.
Lacking context, we don't know what it means. Just because some anons
decided what it means doesn't make it so. If C does mean "Comeny" it
could be simply "exposing Comey's role," there's no indication otherwise.
Anons need to stop substituting their conjecture for fact.
>Before RR goes down.
Where have you been? RR isn't "going down." He's the one that took everyone
down. There certainly aren't many people out there, anons included, that haven't
figured that out. Maybe you should think it through.
>RR won't be leaving on his own, as he thinks.?
He announced his plans to retire in January. Barr begged him to stay. Where
have you been?
>The "Declass" with over take before he can leave with dignity.
He exonerated the President. That's pretty much keeping his dignity.
>the rest of your silly rant
FFS, wake up.
Your speculation was ridiculous. Furthermore, if you're so thin-skinned that you can't take
criticism (which was polite for in here), maybe you should reconsider not posting and
lurk moar? This has been hashed and re-hashed. You're one of the few left that hasn't figured it out.
>Holy fuck you are off. "C" is the COMEY REPORT. Covered here heavily after DiGenova's outing of it.
No shit sherlock. What is in the report? Do you know? Are you and idiot or what?
Did you even read what I said? I specifically said "we don't know what that means."
And I followed up by saying "it may just expose his role." Is that plain English too
hard for your low IQ mind to grasp? Try again anon, you make my case for me.
>RR, RM, and Comey will ALL be exposed for the traitors they are.
You're the only one on the planet that thinks RR or RM are anything other than the
two dudes that just got done exonerating the President, shill. Now we all know exactly what
YOU are. Go back to reddit and convince those dumb motherfuckers you have a
brain. We aren't fooled.
Wait a minute, wasn't it supposed to be "Tomorrow" yesterday? I'm confused. Is it a moving
goal line? If it is, why not wait until it's already started and say "Today?"
>The guy who did "let it roll" movie is a perp."Q" is not a perp, so fuck off.
Do you perhaps mean "larp," not "perp?"
What the fuck is your problem? You're the one that used the word perp, not me. I was
just asking if you meant to use the word larp. Never disagreed with you. Learn language.
Is it just me or is the shill level turned up to stupid tonight?
He's got plenty. He was a Lt. General (3 star). He was serving in a civilian position
so he was not wearing his uniform. There are a lot of reasons to hate the man, this
ain't one of them.
You're not capable of understanding that, are you? The media narrative is that RM
is NOT a white hat. Q merely said "Disinformation push re: Mueller is a white hat." The
media is saying he isn't, in case you haven't noticed.
This is how language works: the disinformation push regards whether or not Mueller
is a white hat, the media is saying he isn't. Q didn't say Mueller isn't a white hat.
Language. Learn it. You'll be surprised at what else you don't understand.
And, before you start, "if RR is dirty, RM is dirty, if RM is dirty, RR is dirty" is equivalent
to "if RR is clean, RM is clean…" It's what's known as IFF or "if and only if" (look it
up if you think you're so smart) or equivalently, an exclusive NOR. Only an engineer, a
scientist, or a lawyer would know that… think, anon, don't just blindly parrot what
others say.
>6434786
That's 3. If I'm right, there should be a fourth. Maybe there was and I missed it.
Not a bad description. Think about it, if all those partisan Ds can't find dirt on Trump,
who can? Nobody, that's who.
A point often missed, btw, is that none of those angry Dems can represent the actual
criminals now. None of them. The most powerful D lawyers in the world are all neutralized.
Brilliance.
>Q said "working to save himself". White hat doesn't work given Mueller's history.
Yeah, working to prove his innocence regarding U1. Q didn't say he was guilty.
Do you think Hillary and Obummer want to take the fall? Do you think they didn't
work hard all those years without making sure everyone was set up in some way?
He's been proving they're the ones that did it. "Saving himself" means "proving
his innocence."
>6434819
That may be the 4th, but a different IP. Hard to say.
>A lot of anons thought and still think Grey Hat is the best description.He exonerated POTUS, and was a blockade at the same time.
Both indicate he's on our side, period. The "blockade" has already been discussed:
while he was doing his thing, nobody was asking about Huber. It's not a slide, either.
The anons in here that are vociferously arguing otherwise want him to be tainted
which means his exoneration is tainted. There's no getting around that simple truth.
It can't be explained, or reasoned away. They want to drag out another investigation.
They want it to cloud the 2020 election in hopes that Trump loses and they get power
back. I'm going to keep pushing this until legitimate anons stup falling for the shill
bullshit. They're lying for a reason.
Oh, and in case you're wondering, in the judicial world, "gray hat" is the same as "black
hat," which is the same as "invalid results" to real judges, and all the judges that will
be reviewing this are Trump appointees, i.e., followers of the law. Keep that in mind.
Because he's been working with the man since the 90s and he knew he'd get a
legitimate investigation and a legitimate exoneration out of the deal. The shills
calling RM/RR black hats actually know this. They're trying to discredit them
so they can discredit the results.
>What is the operational range of a drone?
Predator: 400 km
Reaper: 1850 km
Global Hawk: ludicrous, maybe even plaid.
> What's not clear is if RR/RM were simply predictable or if POTUS gave RM instructions to hire specific people.
They knew what was going on and knew who was really the target,
so it makes sense that they were also well aware of who they needed
to hire, but if they got guidelines, I wouldn't cry over the surprise.
Or set up, which is really my larger point. And no, not "amost everybody," even
Q has stated otherwise. The vast majority are good people, though some of them
have been stuck in no-win situations for sure. The DS still needs to put legitimate
people in powerful places, because they'd be found out otherwise. The bad ones
ultimately do stupid things, and if they're all bad, it would get pretty deep pretty
quick.
>Potus picked RR, because he knew he was dirty and it was a sting.
You do know the sting started long before RR was working with them all, right?
You also understand that anyone in the DS that knows RR is dirty can out him
at any time to get the exoneration tossed, which would result in another investigation
and cloud the next election, right?
You aren't so ignorant that you didn't at least research the very public timelines of
all these people and the consequences of what you claim? Are you? Are you?