>>6436601 (lb)
it's a trick. the MSM journos come here and ask "what's the consensus?" then run with the opinion of one anon, or one planted shill.
consensus is a lie.
bullshit in notables
>>6436142 anon digs on D5: D5 has been hiding in plain sight this entire time
this is a variation on "muh hash strings bring up certain wikileaks emailses" slide.
Your language reveals that you consider anons as separate from yourself, i.e., you are not including yourself in your "anons this anons that" analysis. Very telling.
oddly, when I see screen caps of board text, my first reaction is that shills are trying too hard again.
The 5 media companies made a sustained effort to subvert the United States and to destroy the American people.
outed
not funny. how much longer to go on your shift?
imagine if you were doing something useful.