Anonymous ID: 76e266 May 7, 2019, 8:56 a.m. No.6437390   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7650

>>6437338

TY Baker!!!

 

>>6437359 (lb)

You either take what CDAN has to say at face value, with a little salt, or you don't. If you do, and you read that CDAN post carefully, then you'll know why Pam looks like death warmed over, Soros always had an ear to the ground in world governments, and how JA (presumably) got himself in a bind with the Clintons and the rest of the DS. Honestly, it makes the most sense to this anon.

Anonymous ID: 76e266 May 7, 2019, 9 a.m. No.6437411   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6437388

Wray is in a classified setting, right now, telling all the senators what he couldn't tell us in public due to "matters of national security". If you think it doesn't have jack or shit to do with D5, you might not be paying attention to what's about to happen.

Anonymous ID: 76e266 May 7, 2019, 9:05 a.m. No.6437448   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7473 >>7493

>>6437434

Prediction:

Tulsi Gabbard's platform will be an echo chamber of DJT's, with a bit of adjustment to foreign policy, and she will sound like the best choice for the Democrats. She'll lose the primaries, though, due to Super Delegates. This will further infuriate the base, and many will swap to voting for Trump when this is all pointed out.

Anonymous ID: 76e266 May 7, 2019, 9:20 a.m. No.6437539   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6437493

Exactly! And, to be honest, that's what we want. It will wake up far more Democrats than the last election. The D party is going to nearly cease to exist by the time this plan is over.

Anonymous ID: 76e266 May 7, 2019, 9:23 a.m. No.6437552   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6437510

>Not the term I would use

>the key questions is making sure it's done by the book

<Do you have any evidence

>Not personally

He wants to say treason, but that's not his job. And, as this anon says:

>>6437532

Anonymous ID: 76e266 May 7, 2019, 9:53 a.m. No.6437778   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7826

>>6437650

No anon. I'm saying that there's a distinct possibility that JA was a black hat, then after realizing the shit was about to hit the fan, did some massive dumps, and signaled to white hats he was ready to push the eject button. This gave Trump and team the time to line up everything legally to lock them all up. JA's eventual testimony will be the nail in the coffin.

 

Let me word it to you another way. JA never released anything that was damaging unless the US was the target. Not to mention that despite all the legal "loopholes" to call what they were doing "journalism", it was still espionage. Espionage at a global level. I wonder who would benefit most from that type of data mining?

Anonymous ID: 76e266 May 7, 2019, 10:07 a.m. No.6437873   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7888 >>7909

>>6437661

  1. Nobody wants a brand new corn burner.

  2. People are settling in and paying their debts. A lot of people are also waking up to "flipping" as nothing more than putting lipstick on pigs. In other words, gentrification is bottoming out. Nobody wants to live in shitsville.

  3. Yes, there are tons of rich folks taking the fall right now. We know what's behind it, too, because of Qresearch.

  4. Same as #2.

  5. Same as #2.

  6. Likely impacts from car and home industry stabilization.

  7. Farming has always been a losing game. That's why farmers have had literal subsidies since FDR. Farmers that are just farmers have always had it like this. Sometimes it goes up, sometimes, it goes down. The farm bill was important for many reasons, but farmers should be looking into the hemp market since that just opened up big time.

  8. Same at #7.

  9. Market diversity. People are buying more non Apple products.

  10. Qresearch anons know why that is. Many of those faulty click-bait algorithms are now gone.

  11. CVS cannot compete with WalMart and online pharmacies.

  12. Thank Amazon.

  13. Same as #12.

  14. Thank John Roberts and Obama for meddling with it.

  15. Thank millennials.

  16. Same as #15.

  17. Thank boomers.

  18. Same as #17.

  19. OK, if we're talking actual unemployment, this number should NOT surprise you in the least. Everyone fucks with "unemployment" numbers by presenting a figure that is based on exceptions and exclusions, and reduces the statistical field to persons between certain ages, that are capable of working, and then they surmise that "unemployment percentage" based on that refined starting point. If you add up all the retired, aged out, underaged, and disabled persons not seeking work, as well as the indigent, welfare folks, and general "unemployables" out there, then yes, that number is about a 3rd of the population. It's literally always been that bad.