Anonymous ID: 13a28d May 8, 2019, 12:29 a.m. No.6444104   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4113 >>4124

>>6444071

I think the musically disabled anon is very, very confused. I try to reverse-engineer the thought process that came the conclusion "432 reference for A would be horrible for instruments tuned to b," and (as previously stated) my brain begins to hurt. My entire life as a musician has been spent around people who sing and play professionally. I wonder what the guy behind the counter would say if I walked into Guitar Center, and demanded to be shown "a guitar (or any instrument) tuned to b?" (As anyone slightly familiar with music would imagine, I would expect would be laughed out of the music store.)

 

KEK! That's freakin' funny!

Anonymous ID: 13a28d May 8, 2019, 12:46 a.m. No.6444141   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4157 >>4182

>>6444113

Yes it does, anon- but if the entire guitar is tuned using A=432mhz, then every string, including the B string would also be tuned according to the same reference, (at 8 mhz lower than 440mhz.) The instrument would be played exactly as before. (Assuming the musician can play,) it will have much more pleasant and mellow sound. Many professional musicians are aware of this 'trick,' and insist on tuning their instruments accordingly. If they are in a band, of course, everyone would adjust their tuning to match.

Anonymous ID: 13a28d May 8, 2019, 2:13 a.m. No.6444321   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4351 >>4352

>>6444294

If it's truly "in tune with the resonance of the universe," (and all that jazz,) then it was around a whole lot longer than Pythagoras, Fibonacci, Tesla, and whoever else's name it's proponents like to attach to their little theoryโ€ฆ

If all the hype about it is true, I'd say God invented it, and 1,000s of years later, those guys noticed it, and slapped their name on itโ€ฆ