>>6444027

>432 reference for A would be horrible for instruments tuned to b.

Quite literally one of the stupidest comments I have ever read. You clearly do not know what you are talking about. You can tune any stringed instrument to 432 and it will sound a brighter and cleaner. It's only an 8 c.p.s. change ffs.

>>6444033

>432 sounds great on a synthesizer, though. Make anything sound good even if you're just banging the keys like a gorilla.

Second stupidest comment I have ever read. While 432 hz is far more pleasing to the ear, it will not make you sound great "banging keys like a gorilla". If you don't know your keys and scales, changing to 432 doesn't help a single bit. Because you still sound like an uneducated gorilla banging on the keys.

And yeah. I know what I am talking about. Have been a keyboard player and programmer for decades. I have been creating sounds on 3-D additive synths since they first came out. They can recreate almost any sound almost perfectly, from the sound of a violin, to the sound of a baseball bat/crack of a baseball.

The best tuning for keys is 432 Equal Temperament. But it only works if everyone playing is also tuned to 432 hz.

>>6444134

>Please oh please give original pic sauce.

you lazy pervert you…

http://shnyagi.net/uploads/pic/2017/09-02/taliya_029.jpg

>>6444242

>but from a musical standpoint, neither of those comments made any sense whatsoever.

I know. Like people typing just to be saying something. They made no sense at all.

>>6444257

>Not easy for wind players. Quite expensive in fact.

I made it perfectly clear that I was talking about synths and stringed instruments. Woodwinds are obviously a different story altogether. Duh.

>>6444321

>If it's truly "in tune with the resonance of the universe," then it was around a whole lot longer than Pythagoras (etc.)

No doubt. The relationship of the 432 hz tuning to Sacred Geometry proves this, as it is embedded in our Reality. It already existed, they simply discovered it.