Seconded
They have done the same thing in Palestine.
https://reason.com/2002/04/03/porn-and-politics-in-palestine/
2 Questions:
-
Can the President of the USA declare Martial Law to use certain branches of the US Military to impose a stratocracy-esque authority to restore rule of law with the primary purpose of restoration of the Republic?
Anons might bring up Posse Comitatus, but that's an interesting segue to question 2.
-
If the President of the USA wanted to do something like that, could it be done in a way where such a temporary establishment of Martial Law goes mostly unnoticed by the general public?
Democrats are calling PDJT a "king" or "dictator in chief". Are they doing this because they may recognize a military operation to vie for control over the nation? If they are fighting everything that is going on, knowingly working against a Military imposed "rule of law", then are they operating firmly within the realm of sedition or treason themselves?
Several branches of the US Military are not held to Posse Comitatus, so the Navy, US Marines, and Coast Guard, for example, could operate under the intent of enforcing domestic policies so long as the policies being enacted by federal personnel are in line with the law.
This is something I ponder a lot in regards to what we're watching unfold, in conjunction with Q, what we're doing here, and wondering how much longer it's going to take to lock up all these bastards.
TY BO! Happy Hump Day.
This is what I'm thinking, too. That's why I asked the questions. It just seems like if a US Pres. wanted to truly retake the republic for the purpose of restoration of rule of law, this would be the most effective way, and also ensure you are working with real patriots to accomplish the mission.