>>6448533

True. When displaying an image your PC doesn't "read" it, as in interpret the contents of the image.

But algorithms can be created that does that.

It's all about understanding the information in relation to its surroundings.

<Blue pixel here, green pixel there. 65% chance its a leaf against a sky background (simplyfied but the gist of it)

As i said. I've written bots specifícally to solve captchas so I know it is possible.

With captchas like the ones here it's especially easy because you can request a new captcha at any time and it's only letters so it just have to approximate shapes limited to 26 possible shapes.

>>6448652

>>6448668

>The capcha also uses numbers

I haven't seen any numbers in the captchas. But sure, if there is you can add 10

Upper and Lower case too so double the 26.

Typeface doesn't matter. Basic shape is all that matters.

I'm not saying my bots would have 100% accuracy. And it's not needed.

It can just discard the captcha and request a new if it's too hard.

Colors don't matter either, they are always on a lighter background. And even if it's too hard to make out it just requests a new.

>Hells people can even solve the capchas on a weak slow computer, as in a library

Wha?

>And then there's the problem of having to post something cogent.

That wasn't what we discussed. But a pre-made list of shill posts would be the easiest part of it.

>It's just cheaper to use a person.

Depends on what your goal is. I wrote the bots to prove a point.

>>6448825

Are you Larping as a bot?

Seriously it makes no sense.

>>6448835

>You claim you wrote what bots?

I claim I've written bots that can solve captchas. Not all types. The text based ones specifically.

>I don't believe you.

Not my problem. I think i've provided adequate proof of knowledge in the field.

But it's you perogative. I'm not sharing my work for obvious reasons.

>The pre-made script ? Nope

Not part of the original discussion, just me speculating. I also pointed this out before.

>Even ebot is a guy in Colorado.

Possible, I never claimed to have written E-bot. Kek.

>>6448900

You know what you did.

>>6448935

Wanna dance?

>>6449022

Dubs confirm. Kek.

>>6449066

If you say so.

What does it being "real time" change? All the captchas i've fed my bots was "real time".

Wait no. Don't reply.

This discussion leads nowhere…

Keep believing what you believe and i'll be content in my knowledge of the opposite.