Anonymous ID: a0b7e7 May 9, 2019, 11:12 a.m. No.6455606   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5705

>>6455575

 

Not law fag, but read – this cannot be the correct statute because it talks about inciting some to a crime of violence. What violence have we seen in Nadler's behavior.

 

There are likely other statutes that apply better.

 

As far as congressfags not being subject to the law, that's only Dimocrat congressfags because no one has the balls to charge them. The law is the law.

Anonymous ID: a0b7e7 May 9, 2019, 1:54 p.m. No.6456215   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6308

If RR was a white hat, they would have asked him to stay after they were done using him as a prop.

 

All the public praise is a cover to prevent even more claims of obstruction.