Yep. We have the best volunteer jobs in the world here in Q's Digital Militia.
>>6457224 People ask, "How black is the baby?" Will suggest 0%. Lame PR stunt to try and garner sympathy from non-whites.
>>6457293 Plus, he ain't even a real prince. They offed the real one. But hey, how do we know ANY of them are real people instead of actors playing roles? Queenie & the Prince have been in there FOREVER. How easy to slip in new actors regularly.
>>6457369 True, but how do we know the queen mother was a real person either? Or any of them as far back as we look? This is a very old game.
>>6457401 Most anons doubt that RBG is alive. Ergo, we highly likely have an actor playing a role because it benefits certain people to have the name/function continue unimpeded. Ditto for Stephen Hawking, figurehead mouthpiece for fake science, obviously replaced by someone else for many years until they retired the role. If it suits the major money/political players, "royalty" will continue as well.
Further, if the royals are indeed real people, their genealogy isn't what is claimed IMO. Roth spawn for some time.
Main reason for punctuation, spelling, grammar is for intelligibility. Secondary reason is not to look like an idiot. Messages will be more effective if they look like they come from someone with intelligence.
But it's entirely up to you.
There are a couple of generations that never learned to spell or punctuate because everyone got participation awards and nobody actually learned anything.
Nice graphic!
Statements of fact being made here that RBG is alive bring a grin to my face. Bring the commie out and fingerprint her. The charade continues with claims that could be proven if true, but they are not.