>>6464505 (pb)
all good questions anon, yet for now we seem to have our marching orders: don't bother BO/BV for checking bakers unless the new baker demonstrates rude or counterproductive behavior.
(i don't like it either, because it requires even more discernment on the part of bakers, more pastebin namefagging or more (copyable, forgeable) graphic identifiers. having a BV say yay or nay removed the worry or alerted everyone that there were no bakes on the hash so bystanders beware.
also, seems like if we are to be a free speech board, we have to let anyone bake until their actions prove them unsuitable.