Australia's 'Weekend Sunrise' hates a movie they haven't seen
(The Red Pill)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvLsslFEv7k
Case for study. Questions about banned film the interviewers have not watched but have pre-judged. From pre-judgements assumptions are fabricated. From fabricated assumptions the reinforcement for the banning.
This is how it werks. Kek.
May we not encourage it but puncture it. This case happens to feature a feminist who made a film based on firsthand research and going directly to primary sources. That feminist then left feminism while retaining previous support for equality. This seeming contradiction is resolved even in a confrontational interview from questioners who have not done firsthand research and have not watched the film. Feminism as an ideology can be substitute with other isms that sustain themselves through these same pre-judgement/fabricate assumptions circular thinking.
The best check against that cycle is a basic understanding of human nature. From first principles even the spokesperson for one's own cherished ideology can be held accountable.
The Q posts – on the whole – encourage this approach even on assessment and use of the crumbs dropped by Q. Always test assumptions. Trust but verify, verify, verify. Even when it is the most uncomfortable to do so.
Godspeed Anons.
All Anons.
WWG1WGA