>>6469526 pb
apologists for RR are still at it, and making Notables
Right, they are just good patriots. It's all lies by Roger Stone
Sounds Legit
Hello FBI
And RR even let it be known at his send-off festivities that his daughters only like to watch the Congressional Interviews on the House side
I wonder why?
Also interestgin why actors would be pushing "rr is good" on here day and day with their spam which often gets "Notables"
Must have convinced a lot of gullible anons?
Or not?
Perhaps just flooding of shill influence?
>>6469723 pb Notable
Yes! Comey really thought he would be there for the next 6 1/2 years , right before he was fired
KEK
He bragged about it "You're stuck with me for the next 6 1/2 years"
Check citation below.
in the same speech he told the public that we have no right to Privacy, never did [4th amend. right he took away] and that we had no recourse to refuse to answer a judge [5th amend. took away]
Because why?
Because COMEY was in charge of Mass Surveillance of the population and planned to spy on enemies, haul them into Court and frame them on "TRUMPed up" [punny but not funny] charges.
JUST AS THEY DID TO POTUS
https://canadafreepress.com/article/privacy-no-longer-a-citizen-right-according-to-fbis-comey
No kidding it was from before Comey was fired.
That's the whole point.
Oh I remember shills and people who want to cover-up history want everyone to just be away of "the news today"
Straight out of "1984" playbook
It you read what I wrote you'd know that.
Thanks for the confirm
>Oh I remember shills and people who want to cover-up history want everyone to just be AWARE of "the news today"
Love it when shills confirm an important point and therefor cause it to be highlighted.
Right:
Comey's history has no bearing on what's happening now.
? Ur funny.
d7a0e2
Yes but it's being spammed.
And ignores actual "Q" posts
People behind it hate "Q"
It's a stupid psy-op
What would be a psy-op if no one fell for it
They put a lot of money into this crapola
AND YOU REALLY THINK THE DEEP STATE WOULD'VE GIVEN HER THOSE JOBS IF THEY DIDN'T KNOW WHAT SHE WOULD DO WITH IT?
Hi Brian you are full of shit
You'd better Fuck Off
No, you read what I wrote, over again, and very carefully
"This week was the week of Disinfo
Future will tell
Question of "Good" vs. "Bad" is still up in the air.
After the great send-off of H.W. Bush and of McCursed NoName , no one's opinion of either one changed?;
Since the opinions were built upon facts.
So why should it change about RR?
Remember when it was pointed out that there are not the resources to prosecute everyone involved in the giant octopus - since it takes up a majority of our government and society and entertertainment industry?
Also people have been conditioned for their whole lives and can't take the truth without going insane or fainting on the spot
We see the reactions, The massive push against this board.
; and that many, for purposes of optics, would be allowed to save face and have their familys be proud?
Another question, isn't it essential for our future that the positive reputation of the FBI be restored in the public mind?
Too many cases would have to be re-arbitrated, otherwise?.
Didn't Barr say the other day in front of Congress that it was not the rank and file of the FBI , but just certain leadership who were at fault?
Well I don't believe that, of course.
After the cover-up of 9/11 and so many FF, including LV, perpetrated by the fucking FBI?
Haven't they been running drugs, arms, money, human trafficking for many years?
How could all that be happening without the FBI knowing?
It didn't.
Isn't that why their networks are so tight?
"Q" even pointed out that both RR and his deputy 'Ed" were in brackets.
So if you think the great funeral allowed both massive criminals, HW and McNasty , and granted to them both by POTUS, erased their crimes …?
That's up to you. "It's your choice to know or not to know"
You won't find what I wrote of Q-hater Brian's threads!
That's just proves my point
Why do you think the Senate Rhinos oppose Trump?
That's why "Q" underlined it?
Did Q every write "Trust Rosenstein"?
Did Q write and imply that people who hated on Sessions were in trouble?
Did Q ever put Sessions in brakets.
Rod got the high votes.
Sessions did not
You're missing it entirely if you think that is any proof at all that RR is good guy.
You need to go back to Reddit or catch up.
Sessions got lower votes than RR
That proves Sessions is more solid.
I wish they would stop spamming this BS "RR is a good guy"
"It was disinfo"
Blah Blah Blah
You know what else is disinfo
"rr and Mueller are good guys"
Your point doesn't even make sense
How would the Q drops exactly fake-out Mueller?
They wouldn't, even if he read it and studied it and there's no evidence he does.
Yep. They've got almost as much money on this as for FE
Thing is our crowd is so small on this board it's easy to overwhelm.,
The capcha is a great idea because it proves they can't think on the spot to compose their BS, and have to use scripts. Even if they get though the capchas somebodies got to figure out what to write.
The top writers at Langley SUCK so how will they get their minions to do any good work when they have minimal chance to compose?
If you think Mueller is clean, you are on dope?
Or maybe just haven't studied enough?
When the shills lose the argument they threatend violence.
Perfect proof right here.
The real assholes voted against Rosenstein because they are afraid and don't trust anyone?
There are many reason that could've been
Maybe they didn't want him to get 100% approval. There could be many reasons beside what the shills speculate and try to lead people to believe.
hhahhhahhhahhahhaha