Per the title of the Bread.
In remembrance of the laughing of Ed and Rod on Thursday;
Could Ed also be a double or triple agent?
Could Ed be he another perp, who's the object of an on-going sting?
"Q" had him in brackets.
>>6470799 pb
>>6470618 pb
>>6470830 pb
>>6470544 pb
>>6470565 pb
^^^has to twist the argument and mis-represent in order to "win"
It's just here for the sock-puppet, head-nodder witnesses?; Actual researchers know this particular argument is 100% Sophist trickery
; Glowing and transparent.
You can't prove a lie; and I'm still waiting for the proof; as opposed to (mostly) smears and bullying
>>6470676 pb
Actually No. And you yourself expressed doubt - which shows you yourself do not have the evidence - but have relied on other's "evidence" which you take for granted.
It means you are not the Affiant !
Otherwise you just say you knew.
so per
RR is not supposedly the affient, but truly he is an extremely talented trial lawyer [prosecutor] and so would know exactly how to keep himself out of trouble. His little sing-song voice might work to convince the Jury, but reason is not on his side in this situation -
He let this escapade go on for all that time - 30$million
That was his responsibility; even if he inherited it and did not officially start it [? ; how is that ? When did Strzok's start it How did Strozks hav the authority for that? Comey? ]
Isn't the whole Russian Collusion Hoax an obvious criminal conspiracy by all the top people at the FBI at that time?
POTUS has told us as much many times by now
RR triggered the appointment of Mueller?!
Shouldn't he have gone over the evidence at that time? Or is it enough for him LEGALISTICly to claim he did not know there was no basis for it?
He's got some good rhyming there [no afient], but no good reason.
He also lied about the "technical glich" which held back the Strzok -Page texts.
Oh yeah, why did he hold back so much documentation?
Will little rhymer say it was to help Horowitz , so he'd have more time?
Seems like Alice - in Wonderland "logic"
>>6470662 pb
^^^This anon has got it correct
At best, it's unknown
^^this anon and me are on the same team.
"So what?"
I layed out my evidence and logic here already.
My argument doesn't require copy - pasta, Shill-PAYtriots on Twitter and elsewhere who belittle "Q" - And gang shilling to create Notable.
I use the "Q" statements as part of my proof.. And there's much much moar than just logic and "Q" statements; i.e. evidence
RR signature on the FISA warrant.
It was his responsiblity as initiator of the "investigation" and as the person in charge of it, to know what it was based upon; and if or if not in fact it was based upon anything of substance.
That why would "Q" team writings say that "RR" would be finished when FISA was released? On so many other things on the subject
See linked "Q" posts
There were many "Q" posts on this ,
April 19th this year.
"https://radio.foxnews.com/2019/04/19/john-dowd-rod-rosenstein-has-to-answer-for-appointing-robert-mueller-as-special-council/
https://www.scribd.com/document/406725805/Mueller-Report#from_embed
[Pg 11] Previously CLAS 'scope' [RR] to [MUELLER]
The scope memo [highlighted w/in Mueller report] confirms the 'dossier' was the 'tool' used by [RR] to justify SC and was the primary 'vehicle' to which [RR] tasked MUELLER.
If the dossier was known to be unverified and fake, how then was an investigation started to begin with?
At what point did MUELLER determine there was no collusion?
[18-months ago?]
Was the investigation kept ongoing as a 'talking point' to rig the midterm elections?
Was the investigation kept ongoing to retain the 'BLOCKADE' to essentially restrict POTUS from unmasking and informing the public as to the TRUTH about what really happened?
Was the investigation kept ongoing to PROTECT THOSE WHO 'KNOWINGLY' COMMITTED TREASON/SEDITION?
NO BLOCKADE = GAME OVER
Q"
[in image with trip code]
The alleged anons who go around stating it's "settled" and printing and re-printing the mediocre "essay" every day now?
They are either stupid [not autist-style anons] or pushing it for an agenda?
I've already speculated what that agenda is; and there's many potential answers to that question.
Look at these fucking smirkers, Rod and Ed.
They give a shit what they just put over on the Country these 2 long years.