>>6471718

So when the docs surface even Wray, Barr and Horowitz will be suprised?!

kek

>>6471719

^^^

That's exactly why their pushing it?

Down the line they will accuse,

"POTUS was let off the hook because RR and Mueller worked for him" ?

Not that that even makes sense considering the underlying data and surrounding context!

Yes, but they push it anyway.

As we've seen in so many FF's , logic doesn't matter, making sense doesn't matter, but they own the Media, spokespeople and shill; so whatever they say is "plausible"? And accepted as real.

I know it's a retarded psy-op but it got legs, like FE and "Alex Jones"

Can't help stupid?

>>6471942

That would be anti-Democrat, wouldn't it?

>>6472191

interesting , they broadcast us on YouTube then spam the gore and Doo-Doo porn.

Seems legit.

>>6472215

Without a link I have no idea what is the reference. ? What is the content, context… etc.,

>>6472232

Seems like lost control of account?

>>6472215

Isn't that dude a faker?

I'm listening. Does sound like something happened?

Fame monger?

He's a liar. yahda yada yada.

BS

Thruth is short. Long winded unfocused meandering , which makes no sense is

BS

"I have betrayed all of you"

^^^^This is probably true.

I wonder if info is going to come out about him that he is preempting?

Does look like "mental pollution"

Beware of the Mind / Thought contagion there!