>>6473449 lb
You misunderstand. BV posted the gross pics to try and prevent Anjel from livestreaming a bake, since banning ip's are apparently off limits now.
what victims?
I don't know what the fuck you are talking about. There wasn't any child porn, in spite of what you read. I saw the pic in question. It was an infant with anal prolapse, not a "victim". The other pics were anal gorn porn, illecit, not illegal. So stop being an idiot.
And just fyi, I cussed out BV for using the gore porn.
Was there something wrong with anal pron with prolapses showing? Are you that sick you think it's ok to post here?
Then you are just a complete idiot. Inappropriate to be posted here and was deleted. Nothing illegal was done and if you still believe the FBI should investigate, you have issues.
Really can't believe I have to spell this out for you. I am not on this board to see porn, anal, gore or otherwise. If I want to view porn, I go to a porn site. It's not about censorship. It's about QResearch. Is sking for porn not to be posted here a violatin of free speech? NO. Porn is posted elsewhere, it is not being stopped. Would you want your young children watching a disney movie being subjected to sex scenes during a commercial break. Is that a violation of free speech? No, it isn't. It's called morality and trying to shove free speech into a topic of porn is stupid.
agreed
fuck off faggot
Oh, so you like ass fucking. Good for you. I don't. You go elsewhere if you want to see ass fucking, faggot. ←-literaly.
It is a war zone and I will fight every day to stop ass fuckers like you from posting that sick shit on this board. If you want to watch fucking porn, YOU go elsewhere. Anons have better things to do. dickhead.
You need new glasses. It was a gloved nurses hand holding the infant with an anal prolapse. It happens, sadly. You can find pics like that from medical sites all day long.
There is a huge difference between tits and ass [not a problem] and pics of assfucking with anal prolapse.
So anons saying all forms of free speech should be allowed, that means we should no longer rated any games/movies? So, free speech should mean we should let our children watch porn? Sounds like that's what some of you are saying. If you advocate for porn here, you advocate for it everywhere. Where do you draw the line? Does morality play into free speech at all?
wasn't the point of the post, anon.
I'm not offended idiot. Try harder.
I agree with both. This whole convo started when anon called into question my thoughts on free speech. I even gave BV credit for trying to do something extreme about stopping Anjel. I know chan culture, Not a newfag.
>The BV did it with NAKED INFANT GORE PORN.
Lawd anon, it WASN'T FUCKING CHILD PORN! It was a medical pic taken and posted online that was used. You can find hundreds of pics like it online and it's not porn. Just because the pic was of an anal prolapse, doesn't make it porn. Grow up.
I didn't want to use the Disney analogy, for obvious reasons, but really didn't have a better one to use, thanks to the evil bastards.
Tasteful nudes always welcome, imo as well.
top kek