Anonymous ID: d0dd06 May 11, 2019, 1:41 p.m. No.6473665   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3734 >>3772 >>3866

>>6473656

>Was there something wrong with anal pron with prolapses showing?

I'm not going to make that decision for other people. Is that what you're suggesting? Censoring what others can see? But that would violate the First Amendment, would it not?

 

You must not value the Constitution. Or, perhaps I'm missing something. Please exlaborate.

Anonymous ID: d0dd06 May 11, 2019, 1:59 p.m. No.6473804   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3909

>>6473734

>I am not on this board to see porn, anal, gore or otherwise.

Then you reject the reality of this board. Go elsewhere.

 

>Would you want your young children watching a disney movie being subjected to sex scenes during a commercial break.

If Disney included such material, I would not solicit the business of Disney. They do not. Your point?

 

>It's called morality and trying to shove free speech into a topic of porn is stupid.

This is a fucking war zone, asshat. Either fight or get the fuck out.

Anonymous ID: d0dd06 May 11, 2019, 2:09 p.m. No.6473872   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3886

>>6473866

Prolapses are just a part of reality. So is porn. So what? If people educated their kids to understand reality the way it really is, none of this would be an issue. All of it would be just as uninteresting as it should be.

 

This whole "I'm offended" slide is just another clown op to divide us.