Giving goings on this past week, let us (longtime Anons, seasoned Anons, and newbies all) review Q 3124.
Over the target and taking flack.
Q 3124
Number(s) do not always equate to days.
The face of a watch/clock has multiple versions.
Incorrect interpretations pushed as statements of fact often lead to pitfalls [stranglehold 'choke' tactic used by attackers].
Increase in attacks (de-platform, shill infiltration, MSM/Fake MAGA direct, link(s) to terrorism/acts of violence) only demonstrates validity and close proximity to JUSTICE [PAIN].
Q
-
-
*
-
This Q post explained that increased rate of attacks will serve as a "tell". It is a reaction, by the attacker, to the realization that he or she is being brought closer to JUSTICE. This is experienced by the attacker (our target) as nearing PAIN.
This reaction is feedback to Anons. It serves to validate the version of a watch/clock that has been discerned by Anons.
Expanded: attacks are reactions to pending PAIN and as such are measures, after the fact, of the attacker having been brought closer to JUSTICE.
Expanded: Q posts watch/clock comms to demonstrate Q's control of events that are unfolding at the time of the Q post .
Expanded: If it is posted by Q, it will happen. This is not because Q is making good on predictions (gambling) but because Q is informing Anons of current happenings that in due course will become known by the consequences of those happenings.
Expanded: There is a correlation between the rate of attacks and the validation of the interpretation of a Q watch/clock face by Anons.
Expanded: The increase in attacks that will manifest in different forms. These attacks may show-up with shills in the news or on the Board. These attacks may take the form of MSM anti-Q stories and actions. These attacks may take the form of de-platforming in social meadia. These attacks may take the form of attempts to smear Q and Anons by linking us to acts of violence or terrorism.
That said, please review the track record on interpretations of Q Posts that have featured a watch/clock face.
Q: Incorrect interpretations pushed as statements of fact often lead to pitfalls [stranglehold 'choke' tactic used by attackers].
This cautions Anons. First treat interpretations as interpretations until validated. Second treat with suspicion statements on the Board that assert as fact what is actually an unvalidated interpretation. Third learn to recognize a stranglehold tactic that attempts to transform into predictions a false or mistaken interpretation, i.e. deadlines missed.
Patience Anons, even as eagerness bespeaks commitment.
Allspeed Anons
and God Bless one and all.