Anons,
When parents are coerced into giving their children a plethora of toxic injections (vaccines) the canard used to defend the practice is usually something like: "Vaccines protect those whose immune systems are compromised. You should get your children vaccinated to protect those with cancer or who are elderly or immunocompromised." The false premise of "herd immunity" (which does not exist with vaccine products only with natural transmission of an infection) is also trotted out. Now think about a real "herd" of animals. In nature, only the strong survive. Weak animals are the ones "culled" either by predators, disease or hunters. Returning to the vaccine dogma: Our sense of compassion is naturally awakened when we consider people who are elderly, sick etc. However, we don't take healthy people and mandate or otherwise demand that they damage or kill themselves or their children to protect the weak. Some people volunteer for those roles, but as a civilized people we know that to compel the harm or damage of the healthy to protect the weak is actually HUMAN SACRIFICE. Additionally, looking at the biology of the situation, a "wild type" infection that kills a bunch of people usually (the deliberately incited flu pandemic of 1918 was a likely exception) takes the weak and spares the fertile adults. The vaccine canard needs to be exposed on all levels. We are taking the healthy and destroying them under the guise of protecting the weak. In the end both groups are destroyed. That, of course, is the agenda of the minions of satan.