1.
>I read it, understood it (good teacher) and
2.
>followed the footnotes to other works,
2a
> which I read and partially understood
2b
>(when they really get into their proofs using squiggles and numbers it gets hard to impossible at times i cannot lie) and
3
>followed onto works they suggested, as well as
4
> observing things in the real world,
5
> e.g. I found a paper written by three (iirc) Chinese guys that described the function of Chinese missile batteries in terms of dep.net.analysis meets AI
5a
>which was VERY revealing if you want to maximize (or at least minimize) inefficiencies that have never been detected before in the operational effectiveness of the weapons system
5b
>which is determined by how many actual strikes on target there are in relation to how the weapon is deployed
5b-i
>AND the nature of the user-operator
5b-ii
>not whether the system performs to some pre-set schedule according to a mental drill manual.
Do you think grammar is a motherfucking game, anon?