Wait for the bread.
Assuming that religion is about imaginary friends evidences a complete lack of understanding of religion.
Religion is historical moralistic, and narrative truth while science is objective truth. The two CAN live in absolute harmony.
To state that those that believe in religion are stupid is ignorant.
>I love how easily that triggered - thus proving my point.
Trigger? As in engendering a response to your argument?
>You don't need a theistic, dogma-filled, religion to be a moral/spiritual(conscious) person.
No, you dont. But it certainly helps to have some thoughts on the matter. Would a person with knowledge of religion be more or less informed in making life decisions?
>Wonder what Q meant when they said Humanity, rather than humanity.
No clue, I'm not Q
>Yes, people who blindly latch onto something because it has a crowd are stupid.
And what if they are not blindly latching onto it? What if they thought and pondered and decided. Then would they still be stupid?
>It is what leads to corruption, wars, genocide, among other things.
Your speaking of totalitarianism. A natural occurrence when the finality of things is said to be settled.
>Assuming you know anything about me or my background is also stupid.
Never assumed. Point to where I did and I will explain.,
>I believe even the Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth mentions you don't need a church for worship/meditation/prayer/whatever you want to label it.
One can have whatever relationships they want with whatever beings real or imagined if it helps them navigate life and be a better person.