Anonymous ID: f620eb May 12, 2019, 8:40 a.m. No.6479747   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9750 >>9769 >>9775 >>9780 >>0148 >>0297 >>0307 >>0386

Stacey Abrams: If We Don’t Stop Voter Suppression of Minorities, We Will Be Speaking Russian in 10 Years

VIDEO)

 

Personally I would like her to STFU, close her mouth, fix her teeth, anything except yap about how she lost and it’s everyone else’s fault!

The HRC Model when you lose an Election

Stacey Abrams, the delusional loser of the Georgia gubernatorial race, who still refuses to concede because she believes she actually won the election, warned of a Russian takeover by the year 2030.

Over 100,000 illegal aliens from Central America and Mexico are flooding over the border into the US every month, but Stacey Abrams believes if we don’t stop the (phony) voter suppression of black and brown people, we will all be speaking Russian in 10 years. Makes sense.

 

And the Democrats believe her incoherent ramblings pass for keen logic.

 

Stacey Abrams has repeatedly blamed voter suppression for the reason why she lost to Republican challenger Brian Kemp in the 2018 Georgia gubernatorial. She lost by over 55,000 votes but she really won, just ask her.

 

She didn’t lose because she was a horrible candidate and a tax delinquent, she lost because of evil whitey.

 

“There’s no more fundamental and national security crisis than the theft of our elections, not simply through Russian hacking, which is incredibly important and we have to pay attention to it, but by the suppression of the very voters whose voices could change the direction of our country,” Abrams said speaking at a national security forum on Friday.

 

“If we do not secure our democracy and ensure that every vote counts in 2020, we will be having a very different conversation, possibly in Russian, in 2030,” Abrams said to cheers.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/stacey-abrams-if-we-dont-stop-voter-suppression-of-minorities-we-will-be-speaking-russian-in-10-years-video/

Anonymous ID: f620eb May 12, 2019, 8:41 a.m. No.6479757   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9793

James Comey Contradicts His Own Memo on Trump Oval Office Meeting

 

12 May 2019

NEW YORK — There are major discrepancies between a story told on CNN by disgraced ex-FBI Director James Comey and the same story as Comey recalled it in his infamous memos purportedly memorializing his conversations with President Donald Trump.

 

At a town hall event broadcast on CNN last Thursday, Comey recounted the alleged details of a February 8, 2017 meeting inside the Oval Office.

 

He stated:

 

And so the next time I was alone with him, and he told something that was obviously false, which was very, very important, he was saying in the Oval Office — a torrent of words coming at me. I remember the day, February 8th of 2017, a torrent of words. And among the words were his saying, “We are the same kind of killers that Vladimir Putin is.” He was defending his moral equivalency between us and Putin.

 

And I interrupted and said, Mr. President, no, we’re not the kind of killers that Putin is. And when I said that, a shadow crossed the president’s face, and the meeting was over, because I just popped that cocoon he was trying to draw around us. And so I knew at that point, I went back to the FBI, and said my relationship with this man is over, and that’s not a bad thing.

 

Comey clearly stated that he was “alone” with Trump in the Oval Office during that meeting and that “the meeting was over” because Comey seemed to criticize something the president said. “And the meeting was over, because I just popped that cocoon he was trying to draw around us,” Comey claimed.

 

In his memos on that same February 8 meeting, however, Comey says that he was not alone but met Trump along with Reince Priebus, who served at the time as White House Chief of Staff.

 

“Reince stayed,” Comey wrote in the relevant memo. “Seated to my right as I sat in a chair facing the President,” he said, referring to Priebus.

 

Comey never wrote in the memo that he was alone with Trump, and does not describe Priebus as leaving the February 8 meeting at any time. In fact, he wrote that Priebus “tried to interject” about another matter just one paragraph before Comey describes the conversation about the Putin remarks that he talked about on CNN.

 

At the CNN town hall, Comey said the meeting was “over” just after seemingly criticizing the president, linking the end of the meeting to his criticism. Comey writes: “And I interrupted and said, Mr. President, no, we’re not the kind of killers that Putin is. And when I said that, a shadow crossed the president’s face, and the meeting was over, because I just popped that cocoon he was trying to draw around us.”

 

By contrast, in his memo, Comey described the conversation continuing after the Putin remarks, moving on to “other pleasantries and we wrapped up with handshake.”

 

The description of “pleasantries” and a handshake does not fit with Comey’s narrative on CNN that the meeting ended and also that he “knew at that point” that his “relationship with this man” — Trump — “is over, and that’s not a bad thing.”

 

Comey’s memo instead reads:

 

He then pivoted to the Russians wanting an apology from Bill O’Reilly. I said I had seen that and O’Reilly’s reply, which was to “call him in 2023.” The President then said that O’Reilly’s question about whether he respected Putin had been a hard one. He said he does respect the leader of a major country and thought that was the best answer.

 

He then said. “You think my answer was good, right?”

 

I said the answer was fine, except the part about killers. Because we aren’t the kind of killers that Putin is. When I said this, the President paused noticeably. I don’t know what to make of it, but he clearly noticed I had directly criticized him. The conversation then moved to other pleasantries and we wrapped up with handshake.

 

In the version provided to CNN, Comey says “And so I knew at that point, I went back to the FBI, and said my relationship with this man is over, and that’s not a bad thing.”

 

In the memos, though, Comey does not say anything about the relationship being “over.” Indeed, he describes a subsequent Oval Office briefing and details three phone conversations with Trump after the February 8 meeting.

Aaron Klein

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/12/james-comey-contradicts-his-own-memo-on-trump-oval-office-meeting/

Anonymous ID: f620eb May 12, 2019, 8:47 a.m. No.6479795   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0229

Remember Patriots These Are The Frontrunners (losers) on the Dem side for President if the US, no wonder Trump will just talk about his Amazing Record

 

Bernie Sanders, above, sponsored 214 bills since 2007 and two became law, one naming a post office.

 

By Max Diamond, RealClearInvestigations

April 25, 2019

Many top Democratic presidential candidates share big ideas about how to transform the country, including free college and “Medicare for all,” but the prominent ones who serve (or have served) in Congress share something else in common: little or no legislation passed.

 

And it’s not for lack of proposing.

 

Using data extending through the last completed congressional term, RealClearInvestigations found:

 

Sen. Cory Booker, in office since 2013, sponsored 118 bills and two became law.

 

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, in office since 2009, sponsored 302 bills and one became law.

 

Sen. Kamala Harris, in office since 2017, sponsored 45 bills and none became law.

 

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, in office since 2007, sponsored 365 bills and 14 became law.

 

Sen. Bernie Sanders, in office since 2007, sponsored 214 bills and two became law.

 

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, in office since 2013, sponsored 105 bills and none became law.

 

Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke, in office 2013-2019, sponsored 65 bills, and one – naming a post office – became law.

 

Newly announced candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden, who served in the Senate from 1973 to 2009, sponsored 351 bills and 20 became law.

 

Those are success rates of less than 2% or worse, with the exceptions of Klobuchar's 3.8% and Biden's 5.7%. And even though the latter is the top legislative achiever in this group, few would be apt to call him Joltin' Joe if he were playing baseball with a career batting average below .060.

Anonymous ID: f620eb May 12, 2019, 8:59 a.m. No.6479868   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0299

>>6479793

Yeah I kinda agree, but if Treason against a President of the US and it’s people is a good reason for military tribunals. Hopefully so much is disclosed it’ll be hard for anyone sane to oppose it. Plus it will make traitors in the future, think twice! A few tribunals should do it

Anonymous ID: f620eb May 12, 2019, 10:18 a.m. No.6480280   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6480148

She was caught vote rigging, they’re investigating her now, she’s building her stupid defense, the Russians did it abd they are responsible for everything. And every republican is on their side and are keeping the minority vote down. She apparently doesn’t realize the dem party wanted slavery and she stupidly thinks she an accepted member of the cabal. She really shouldn’t eat so much:)

Anonymous ID: f620eb May 12, 2019, 10:23 a.m. No.6480307   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6479747

Regarding Abrams and her HRC excuse.

 

I just thought of something, I wouldn’t be surprised a bit if HRC was involved in changing the psychology of children in the 80s by passing out fake trophies for just showing up. Gonna do some digging since she’s been involved in the child campaign since at least the early 80s or sooner. That would be something she’s plan as a cultural shift, take the will to win out of people when she conquers the world and kills people. Yeah, I think she’s that evil and diabolical to plan something decades in advance. Remember in Arkansas children and early childhood education was her plot

Anonymous ID: f620eb May 12, 2019, 10:29 a.m. No.6480351   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6479753

How much sicker do you have to be to carry a child on your back and say, this thing in my back was my choice, I could have easily killed it, because I have choice?