Happy Mothers Day to All Those Celebrating

The reason I am including the entire text is because the source is unreadable without the corrections I have made. Enjoy!

THE ULTIMATE UNSEEN HAND BEHIND THE NEW WORLD ORDER - CHAPTER 9 THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

Who created the Catholic Church? I have a really hard time believing that it was the disciples of Jesus. The church has never taught the true message that Jesus was teaching to the disciples and the masses of people.

The only conclusion that makes any sense is that the Catholic Church is a duel church. We know that the Catholic Church has what is called a "White Pope" and a "Black Pope". In simple terms this must mean that there is the public and the hidden agendas of the church. The public view is in charge of false teachings, brainwashing and misleading of the people. The hidden agendas of the church that, "the good Catholic common folk" have no idea exist, under the outward cover" of the church, is all evil. Up until Jesus time in the ancient writings there is a flood of information on the Scribes and Pharisees. After Jesus left they quickly disappeared and the Holy Roman Catholic Church appeared, suddenly. Could it be that the Jewish Scribes and

Pharisees are the ones that really created the Catholic Church just to control the people to prevent them from evolving with the teachings that Jesus brought to earth. It is now known from the angles that are communicating with man that Jesus disciples and some followers were able to do the same miracles that Jesus could do. There are even people that ascended the same as Jesus. Refer to the chapter on "The Apotheosis Project."

No government, nor church can control people that are limitless and can manifest anything, food, water, clothing and shelter with a focused thought. That is why a corrupt church and government work well together because together they have for 2000 years systematically killed off everyone that they thought was remotely close to practicing Jesus' teachings like the group known as the "Albigensians". It is the "Jewish Khazars" that are pushing the corruptness and complete annihilation of the 12 lost tribes the Gentiles as the Talmud refers to them. As for our United States government, the "Khazar Jews" have been systematically for the last 25 years scarfing up every position in congress. After studying the Talmud and the Kabbalah and the doctrines of the illuminati it is easy to understand why our government is writing laws of such "Atrocity Levels" to be used on the unsuspecting Anglo-American citizens.

The "Christian" religions sprang (obviously) out of the life of Jesus, and from the subsequent activities of his disciples. From the times of the earliest writings that are today formed into the compendium colloquially known as the Bible, there were many forms of this so-called Christian religion, and they did not always agree with each other, even down to such fundamentals as to who (or what) Jesus really was, as well as to how their various religious rituals were to be practiced, and how their doctrines (and dogmas) were to be disseminated. The Romans sacked Jerusalem in A.D. 70, and most of the writings concerning these "Christian" religions were lost. What today survives to form the current Bible's New Testament was written, at the earliest, from between the years of 65 A.D. to around 100 A. D., about 32 to 67 years after the crucifixion. The majority of the "Christian" writings, or, at least the religious writings of the time which did survive, with the obvious exception of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi Scripts, ended up in the hands of the Roman Catholic Church, and it made use of those writings to its greatest advantage.

From its lowly start the Roman Catholic church grew and developed, influencing members of the Roman Senate and the rulers of other neighboring lands to such an extent that Rome itself gave over a significant part of Rome to the Church, which part of the old city is still to this day a separate and autonomous, tax free State within the boundaries of the City of Rome, in the country of Italy, called and known as Vatican City.

>>6479861

Around 250 A.D. the Roman Catholic Church emerged as the biggest and most powerful organized "Christian" religion. It began to infiltrate and destroy, or overcome, and absorb, the many and variegated "Christian" sects and religious organizations, and also began trying to eradicate some of the more ancient religious beliefs, mainly through the "re-education" of the proponents of such religions, or through the destruction or the confiscation and subsequent hiding of ancient "biblical texts" and other religious and historical manuscripts.

In the fourth Century, Emperor Augustine (354-430) virtually re-wrote both the bible and the "laws" of the Roman Catholic church, and the basic tenets, doctrines and philosophies of the Roman Catholic Church still to this day reflect his beliefs, namely ( i ) that God is a being that is outside of each human being, (ii) that only the Grace of God could change a person's sinful ways, and that only certain people would be chosen by God to be given that particular dispensation, and that (iii) people could only be considered to receive this divine Grace if they were a member of the Roman Catholic Church and received the sacraments. Anyone who was not with the Church had to be against it.

To ensure the growth of the Church, it embarked upon a campaign against people and countries which was to continue, on and off, and in many forms, for many centuries.

Anyone who did not belong to the Roman Catholic Church and who did not conform to the tenets and edicts of the Roman Catholic Church could be accused of heresy. The charge of "Heresy" or of being a "heretic" could be leveled against anyone from noble to serf. The doctrines of the Catholic Church were regarded as God's Law, and therefore formed the basis of Man's Law. and therefore the charge of heresy was a charge leveled not only by the Church, as a charge that the individual's beliefs did not conform with the doctrines of the Church, and therefore God, but also it was a charge of criminal activities or even treason against the State, and the poor wretch had to answer to both. Even the lowly priest had to be careful, he, more than anyone, as a member of the Church, had to conform or suffer the same consequences. Thus the Roman Catholic Church acted not only as "God's police force", but also as the police force of the State, and, in most places, the Country. All of these "ministrations" of the Roman Catholic Church, being presided over by the careful and watchful eye of the presiding Church dignitary, depending upon the jurisdiction, from a bishop or cardinal up through the ranks of the Church to the Pope himself.

By the eleventh century their main objective was realized in that almost everybody in the "civilized world" generally was either (a) ignorant as to the prior existence of any form of Christian religion other than the Roman Catholic Church, or (b) was too afraid to enter into any form of private discussion of the matter of other religions, leave alone start a public debate or argument about it. The Crusades changed all that.

The Crusades

The official reason of the time as to why the first Crusade to the Holy Land was undertaken is that as a result of the interference with travelers and pilgrims by the Turks, and the fact that the Islamic Turks were in the "Holy Land" at all. Pope Urban II in a council of churchmen and noblemen at Clermont, France, in 1095, called for good (Roman Catholic) Christians to rescue the Holy Land from the clutches of the barbarous Turks, priests took up the cause, spreading the message through their Churches and thousands of "good Christian people" volunteered to fight and die for the Roman Catholic cause.

The first Crusade of 1096 was led by the Norman Knights, Godfrey de Bouillon, Count Robert of Flanders, Count Raymond of Toulouse, Bohemund. etc., etc… These Knights eventually conquered Jerusalem, and caused Godfrey de Bouillon to be "crowned" as head of the newly created (and re-liberated) Kingdom of Jerusalem. Of these Norman Knights, Godfrey de Bouillon could trace and prove his lineage and ancestry directly back to King Merovee, patriarch of the Merovingian Dynasty of French Kings, and one of the first Kings of France (the Franks) in 417 A.D.

>>6479861

The reasons as to why these particular Knights went to the Holy Land is still somewhat obscure, but for the purposes of this chapter, suffice it to say, for the moment, that the scrolls discovered amidst the caves at Qumran near the Dead Sea in 1947, and, more particularly the copper scrolls discovered thereafter, along with the known travels of Joseph of Aramathea and Mary Magdalene after the crucifixion, may give the astute researcher several hints as to how this Crusade alone returned from the holy land with "great treasures and knowledge and wealth", while thousands of participants in the subsequent Crusades died, either while trying to get to the holy land, or at the hands of the Turks when they got there, or while trying to escape back to their homelands and more particularly the clues as to why subsequent Crusades were nowhere near as "successful".

In 1 187 [sic], the Turks recaptured Jerusalem, prompting the third Crusade which was to take King Richard into the "holy land", leaving Prince John in charge (on the English Throne) and which also caused the creation and the signing of the Magna Carta.

Part of the "Knowledge" brought back from the Holy Land by the first and subsequent Crusades was to eventually trickle down to the general public and would seriously challenge and undermine the religious authority of the Roman Catholic Church. Knowledge and. above that, proof, came down to the masses that there had. Indeed, been all kinds of "Christian" religions, and the Roman Catholic Church had not been the only one.

The "Pagan" Religions

When the Romans, under Julius Caesar, conquered Europe, France and England (between 58 and 54 B.C.), they found various cultures which had for more than a thousand years, practiced a so-called "pagan" types of astrological religion, worshipping Sun, Moon, Stars and Earth. The Gauls and Celts were predominantly farmers, relying on such astrological calendars as Stonehenge and other Pre-civilization monoliths and burial grounds which were strewn all around France and England to tell them when to plant and sow and reap their harvest, which just is not the truth about these objects but the pagan religions thus practiced in this way a life and means of survival.

Given that the Roman religion itself was based on the worship of multiple Gods, the old pagan religions of the European theater did not pose much of a threat, and the two types of religion cohabited in harmony, until the advent of the Roman Catholic Church, and the new knowledge gleaned from the Crusades.

Religious persecution

At the beginning of the twelfth century, the "Dark Ages" or "Inquisition" began in Europe and in 1215, with their new found freedom granted by the Magna Carta, the Church started a new type of program closely allied to the inquisition, but with a new twist. The focus was still mainly on heretics, but now the net broadened to include those members of the general populace who had any direct or indirect knowledge of an "old Pagan" pre-Christian religion as well as the more modernistic persons who practiced or preached any of the new Christian (non-Catholic) religions. Thus began the era of the "Witch Hunts", or the "Dark Ages".

The Witch Hunts

This was an age reigned over by the terror of the Roman Catholic Church which was to last more than two hundred years. The Roman Catholic Church declared that anyone who was still practicing any "old" religion had to be working for Satan and was therefore, either a witch, or a warlock. The same accusation as had been leveled for centuries were again leveled from nobleman to serf, but this time the accusation was not heresy, but that of being a witch (female), or warlock (male).

Some very nasty trials and horrible tortures were devised to find out if an accused "Witch" or "Warlock" was engaged in the "pagan practice of the devil's work". To be merely accused as a witch or warlock was quite literally the signing of your death warrant, and all done in the name of God, the Holy Roman Church, the King, the Country and, of course, for the "salvation" of the people from eternal damnation (of not belonging to the Roman Catholic church, and/or the learning of the truth?). Don't you know the truth will set you free really! And the church could not have that.

>>6479861

A group of men, headed by the "Witch finder", usually a self-proclaimed expert or dignitary of the church, and the local Baron or Earl would ride into a village and announce a "witch hunt", and they had some very bizarre ways of finding a "witch" or "Warlock".

Torture

In many cases, this self-appointed inquisition would single out two or three of the persons of the village, or even their own priest, who would be questioned (and even tortured and maimed) in order to find out which members of the village would be most likely to be found to be a witch or heretic. Some horrific systems and instruments of torture were devised specifically for this "religious trial". Inevitably, someone, while being tortured, would scream the name of one, if not several of their friends and neighbors who the inquisition could then question (and torture) and subsequently find to be a witch or heretic.

Victims

Anyone who was thought to be a little abnormal (mentally retarded or "touched") or just a little strange, if someone in the village simply didn't like you, or an old maid or widow who lived alone and practiced herbal remedies, a particularly beautiful young woman who was thought to have the power to "bewitch" the young men of the village, anyone with a birthmark or freckles, anyone who was crippled from birth by a strange disease (Spina bifida, polio, downs syndrome etc.,), or who had a strange disease or malady (leprosy, epilepsy), or was known to have an animal (a black cat or dog) which could be a "familiar", even someone who just showed they were "too scared" of the witch finder, everybody could be accused of being possessed, bewitched, or of being of an old "Pagan" faith, and would be subjected to the two specific tests of the trial.

The Trial

The first thing that would happen was that the accused unfortunates would be brought out into the village square and the whole village population would have to witness the "witch bane".

One by one the accused would be stripped naked, placed on a special table, and subjected to a most intimate and undignified search, the object of which was to find the "mark of the devil'" this mark could be a wound scar, a birthmark, a mole, or a spot or pimple.

When a mark was found, and one usually was, the accused would then have to undergo the test of the bodkin. This was a needle approximately twelve inches long which would be stuck into the unfortunate victim in and around the devil's mark. If the victim did not feel the needle, or the puncture did not bleed, then he or she was definitely a witch. Some of these needles were in a sliding handle, so the witch finder could make it look like the needle was going into the victim when it was not, and the people would declare her a witch at once. A little pressure could be applied to the exit wound so that it did not bleed; automatically he or she was a witch. There were many tricks to the witch finder's trade, and he rarely left a village without killing two or three people.

When, the victim had been declared a witch, the witch finder, as per the victims "constitutional rights", had to conduct a proper trial. The jury was the whole village. The prosecution had to find out if the Good Lord would redeem the soul of this unfortunate wretch. The defense was the Good Lord himself.

>>6479861

Test 2

If the village had a village pond, the victim had to go to the "dunking stool", a device like a child's see-saw, with a chair tied to one end. The naked victim was tied into the stool and submerged in the freezing water for very long periods of time, up to fifteen minutes, and never for less than three time. If he or she drowned, then the Good Lord had obviously decided to spare his lamb from this torment and had taken his or her soul to himself.

Tests

When the village was in a hilly area, then the victim was taken to the top of one of the hills, and encased in a barrel, through the outside of which the villagers drove large nails, and the barrel, with the victim now inside, was allowed to roll down the hill. Again, as with the dunking stool, if the victim died, the Good Lord had taken his soul.

If, by some freak of nature, the unfortunate accused survived this torment, then it was obvious that the devil was in her, or him, for no mortal could possibly have endured it. That was absolute proof of guilt, and the victim was convicted and sentenced.

Sentence

The sentence, in either case, when convicted of being a Witch or Warlock, has to be burned alive at the stake, and this done in public in the village square. Either way, to be accused was to die horribly.

Quite obviously, to live in this age was to live in dread and fear of either mutilation or death at the hands of any of the overzealous "witch finders" of the day.

By the turn of the fifteenth century, most, but not all of these inquisitions had fizzled out. Society was, from our modem day standpoint, till in very sick shape, but even with this type of society England and Europe gradually prospered and grew more civilized. When Columbus returned from his 1492 voyage of discovery and told the people of the new world in the West, they started again to dream.

THE OATH OF THE JESUITS AND THE KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS FOUND IN THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE, 1913, PAGE 3216

I , now in the presence of Almighty God, the blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, and all the saints, sacred host of heaven, and to you, my Ghostly Father, the superior general of the Society of Jesus founded by Ignatius Loyola, in the pontification of Paul the III an continued to the present, do by the womb of the Virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear that his holiness the Pope, is Christ's vice regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing given his holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, States, Commonwealths, and Governments and they may be safely destroyed. Therefore to the utmost of my power I will defend this doctrine and his holiness's right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway and the now pretended authority and Churches of England and Scotland, and the branches of same now established in Ireland and on the Continent of America and elsewhere, and all adherents in regard that they may be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome.

I do now denounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince, or State, named Protestant or Liberals, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates, or officers.

I do further declare that the doctrine of the Churches of England and Scotland, of the Calvinists, Huguenots, and others of the name of Protestants or Masons to be damnable, and they themselves to be damned who will not forsake the same.

I do further declare that I will help assist, and advise all or any of his Holiness's agents, in any place where I should be. In Switzerland, Germany, Holland, Ireland, or America, or in any other kingdom or territory I shall come to and do my utmost to extirpate the heretical Protestant or Masonic doctrines and to destroy all their pretended powers, legal or otherwise.

>>6479861

I do further promise and declare that, notwithstanding I am dispensed with to assume any religion heretical for the propagation of the Mother Church's interest to keep secret and private all her agents' counsels from time to time, as they in trust me and not divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing, or circumstances whatever but to execute all that should be proposed, given in charge or discovered unto me by my Ghostly Father, or any of this sacred order.

I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion or will of my own or any mental reservation whatsoever, even as a corpse or cadaver, but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the miUtia [sic] of the Pope and of Jesus Christ.

That I will go to any part of the world whosesoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions north, jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America whatsoever is communicated to me.

I do further promise and declare that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly and openly against all heretics, Protestants and Masons, as I am directed to do to extirpate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex, or condition, and that will hang, bum, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics; rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their infants' heads against the walls in order to annihilate their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisonous cup, the strangulation cord the steel of the poniard, or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agents of the Pope or superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy father of the Society of Jesus.

In confirmation of which I hereby dedicate my life, soul, and all corporal powers, and with the dagger which I now receive I will subscribe my name written in my blood in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the militia of the Pope cut off my hands and feet and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulfur burned therein with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul shall be tortured by demons in eternal hell forever.

That I will in voting always vote for a Knight of Columbus in preference to a Protestant, especially a Mason, and that I will leave my party so to do; that if two Catholics are on the ticket I will satisfy myself which is the better supporter of Mother Church and vote accordingly.

That I will not deal with or employ a Protestant if in my power to deal with or employ a Catholic. That I will place Catholic girls in Protestant families that a weekly report may be made of the inner movements of the heretics.

That I will provide myself with arms and ammunition that I may be in readiness when the word is passed, or I am commanded to defend the church either as an individual or with the militia of the Pope.

All of which I, , do swear by the blessed Trinity and blessed sacrament which I am now to receive to perform and on part to keep this, my oath.

In testimony hereof, I take this most holy and blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist and witness the same further with my name written with the point of this dagger in my own blood and seal in the face of this Holy Sacrament.

https://archive.org/stream/pdfy-jahQeqPP_0mKmwLr/The-Ultimate-Unseen-Hand-Behind-the-New-World-Order-666-Pandoras-BOX_djvu.txt

THE ULTIMATE UNSEEN HAND BEHIND THE NEW WORLD ORDER - CHAPTER 1 - THE ORIGINS OF MISINFORMATION

The methods of recording the events of the past for posterity and the edification of future generations have changed over the millennia. Thousands of years ago knowledge of past events was passed on from generation to generation in the form of stories, related by fathers to sons and to others willing to listen.

The origin of the word "History" comes from that practice of narration in that each legend so recited would be "his story", but the advent of writing changed the method of recital.

Historians became relatively passive, relating their story just once, leaving the efforts of learning to the reader.

The spoken, or narrated story changed down through the ages and the telling, mutating into far more than the realities of the original exploits of the principal players in the drama into legends extolling the super human characteristics of the heroes of the saga, but also at the same time they would degenerate into nothing more than mere legends.

But transcribe "his-story" into writing thereafter cannot be changed, or can it?

Aside from the origins of the word which describes the discipline, there is also a related and unwritten law: History' has always been written by the winners.

Contrary to popular belief, it is neither a legal requirement nor a fact that the winner always writes a true account of history. If the victor is corrupted, or has interests to protect from the public, for example: why the war was created in the first place, he is in a position, being the winner, to make sure that the unsuspecting public never gets to know.

How? He simply writes and rewrites the history books, or causes the history books to be re-written, and everyone knows that the history books are correct, aren't they?

Wars have been fought down through the millennia, and almost always, when over, the victor always gets to write down the results. Where the "true" accounts of the "magnificent exploits" of the victorious are applauded and extolled to the world (whatever comprised "The World" at that time), the comments and observations of the vanquished have been (if not outright destroyed) suppressed, and consigned to a dusty, second rate status of “archives (written by nobodies)", thereafter to slowly decompose into the mists of antiquity and (hopefully) never again reach the light of day.

The victor is therefore exalted as the one who had "right" (and inevitably, God as well) on his side, and the vanquished become in posterity, if not criminals, and then simply misinformed non-entities who fought for a lost and often evil cause. If anyone should doubt that, then consider how history would be written today (in either Japanese for the U.S. side of the Atlantic and the Pacific, or German for the European and North African theatre) should the "nasty other side" have won the second world war! What then would become of the British "Stiff upper lip, old chap" or the "American Way of Life", or any of the other colloquial cliches which are abused in describing this "wonderful" Current way of life?

If the ownership of control of the Power and/or Lands and/or ideals (and "ideals" usually disguises want of either power or land, or both) have not been decided by the Act of War, then such "coups" have usually been accomplished in other ways.

(1). Assassination has always been a good, clean way. Simply kill the incumbent leader; this method has a time honored history.

(2). A more insidious method (but still effective) is the usurping of the authority and power by one or more individual(s) who, while appearing to be loyal to the master, manage, through one means or another, take away his power. This method can be broken down into several sub-methods:

(A). Cause the incumbent leader to "fall from grace" (this most likely in the case of a politician), but, in this instance, make sure you are yourself popular in the public eye, in order to be able to take over, or:

(B). Wait until the King is incapacitated by some debilitating illness and unable to take care of his kingdom (or estate), then surreptitiously take it out from under him, or;

>>6479901

(C). Wait until just after the King dies, (even if prematurely) then.

(i). Place the heir on the throne while making sure he has no ability or opportunity to exercise any power until you have exerted enough influence over the inexperienced new monarch to get him to leave everything in your control, then you kill him; or

(ii). Employ method number one against the heirs and descendants of the King. That is kill the heir, then place someone else, a close relative, perhaps, on the throne, but be sure that the new King is someone who is (a) popular with the masses (such a member of a family which used to be in control), and (b) someone whom you can directly, or indirectly control, and have him appear to be in control, but, in reality, control everything directly yourself.

(3). As a side thought, the "Wars" do not have to be wars which involve armies, tanks, ships and aircraft and weapons of mass destruction, unless they are for a "major cause", they can also be minor "wars" or "conflicts", or "police actions", or "peace-keeping efforts" of a political or economic nature.

Where we are not dealing with the likes of the King or a Country, there are other ways which deal, more specifically, with individuals or corporations, but most of the methods adopted against the individual or companies embody, at least in principle, a rough approximation (if not direct copy) of, those outlined above.

Of course, there are more subtle and ingenious ways to wrest control of assets from others, but there is not enough space in this book to address all the finer details of that particular craft, only those which pertain to the main subjects and object of this book.

This book will address the events relative to the time period from Biblical time but (predominantly the 1700's and 1800's) before the American Civil War; then the events of the Martial Law period of the Civil War, and then the developments after the Civil War Martial Law period up to the present day and all the hidden secrets that I have been able to uncover and the possible or probable events of the future and all the intertwining connections.

It is the intention of the author, to present the real facts pertaining to the true history of the development of the state of affairs that have not only unfolded into the United States of America but how it reaches into the other countries of the world.

Many hundreds of books including school text books and other fictional or non-fictional books on the History of The United States have been written by many well renowned and famous historians, and it is not the intent of this author to malign or disparage their efforts in any way.

Other writers have attempted to "educate" the general public with other literary efforts, which, while the authors claim many years of dedicated and diligent research, either failed to conduct such research, or, in the worst cases, relied upon gossip and "research" of persons who not only had a complete lack of knowledge regarding the subject matter, but had little if any knowledge as to how to properly use a library. It therefore stands to reason that such authors can and could not hope to achieve their claimed elevated status as revelers of the real truth owing to the fallacious nature of their methods of research and inquiry.

Still other "writers" claim to have gleaned their immense knowledge of the subject matter through intimate friends "on the inside" of corporations and/or the activities which form the primary subject matter of their "books".

While this, on the outside, may offer some means of finding out things otherwise impossible to discover, and even may seem to be the only way to get to the bottom of the "problem," it also should be realized that those "friends” have, not only their own interests, job, and families to protect, but, in some cases, matters of national security, and therefore are not going to give over vital or even truthful information for fear of reprisal or worse! Where the informant is perhaps an executive of this corporation, even then, contrary to popular belief, executives are not always privy to the real truth, and are often manipulated by the deliberate dissemination of misinformation and, in some matters, kept entirely "in the dark" by their superiors.

>>6479901

While in some circumstance it is necessary to rely on the efforts of some of the true historians of the past in gaining source material for a pending publication, the author also must be very careful in selecting truly relevant historical material, and therefore must adopt several rules regarding his sources, namely; a). If it is necessary to rely on historical authors, choose well known and respected authors, whose books are well and truly corroborated by other respected historians, or (b). While they are an interesting source of information, no newspaper or magazine article can be relied upon for, or regarded as the true version of concrete historic fact. This should be an obvious choice, yet so many disregard it. While some newspaper articles in the more respected newspapers are quite truthful, factual and beyond reproach, it is generally accepted that they are, at best a dramatic embellishment.

The other notable type of article as presented is by the proverbial supermarket tabloid, and can only be described as an entirely fictional account of a non-existent event, such as shown by the headlines, "Man dies in love-pact with 47 cows", or "Mink Coat comes alive at dance and bites owner to death", or the ever popular stories of the latest antics of the Hollywood superstars which are presented by such magazines in such a way as to cause the subject of such pseudo-libel to have little or no legal recourse, while affording said tabloid the luxury of cashing in on the gossip hungry people who buy such supermarket newspapers and magazines.

And yet some of these above mentioned less than thorough researchers rely on the likes of these newspaper stories. Fictions and gossips as "historic fact."

Of the more respectable and irrefutable newspaper articles, the majority, such as those written at or about the turn of the twentieth century which deal with such subject matter as the persons of the Rockefellers, or J.P. Morgan, the Lehman Brothers, Thomas Edison, Marconi, etc., or which trumpet the achievements of the government of the day.

As shall be shown in subsequent pages, can only be relied upon to furnish proof of the existence of such people or the government, and to furnish a reasonable assumption that the purported actions of those people did take place, and not as a true and correct record as to what those people or governments did or why or when they did it.

In both Corporate and government circles, the "news" is nothing more than the information those particular "leaders" wished to be made public at that time. In short, propaganda.

If you, the reader, should doubt that statement, consider the way that the media has been used to document the actions of the government since the American Korean War. Sorry, the Korean "Police Action", and every other "war" or "conflict" since then. How many of the true facts emerged into the realms of the general public?

A true and correct account of history cannot be achieved by viewing today's result of prior actions, and then attempting to deduce what possible singular action it was which achieved that particular result. Although this may be relatively accurate for the short term, it becomes hopelessly inaccurate in the long term.

I might view a building and, from its form, function, architecture and design, and who visits it and why. I might deduce that it is a MacDonalds (hamburger business?), built around 5 years ago, obviously a thriving business in the area and doing well after 5 years. I might delve a little deeper into the mystery and also consult with a local individual and find out that it is actually a franchise which is 5 years old, but that the headquarters of the company that is the parent company is about 20 years old, that and the "M" of the Golden Arches obviously is the cryptic design of the "M" of MacDonalds. But go to the intersection of Lakewood and Torrance Boulevard in Downey (90241) in California and view the 1950s style structure which is one of the surviving buildings of the original chain started in San Bernardino in California, and you will see in the buildings' design where the famous Golden Arches came from.

For a true history of the formation and development of the United States of America, and the so-called American industrial revolution, there are several areas in which to research which offer a wealth of information, the following are just a few:

>>6479901

1. Congressional Records, Library of Congress, and official Historical Societies.

1. Law libraries and the libraries of various universities which are recognized as being among the best in teaching law and its practice.

1. Specialist historical publications by authors recognized by their peers (betters, not equals).

1. The records of lineage and achievements of such legally recognizable entities as the National Historical Society, the Mayflower Society etc.

1. Family record, of those families involved from the beginning in the areas of interest.

All of the above are extremely useful in finding the bones of the truth, but the meat of the proof must be found elsewhere.

There is one area which is available to all, and all can view it at any time. The information sought in this area, is, when acquired, legally admissible in to any Court in the land, as against, for example, library records (which do not constitute legally admissible evidence). In order to tap into this wealth of knowledge and proof, the researcher must have at least a better than rudimentary knowledge of the subject matter (acquired through the use of all the research areas mentioned in clauses 1-5 above), and an ability to ferret out the real historical facts from the fictional propaganda. The sequence of research, in the case of the famous MacDonalds, in order to find out exactly when and where the company was formed, is to go first to the Head Office to ask when and where. Then, to make sure, go to the County Court House of the particular State and County, and research the Books of Corporations and find the actual ocument of Incorporation which must, by law, be filed in that courthouse. If you cannot then find it, there are four possibilities:

(a). They were mistaken (or worse) at head office;

(b). The documentation for MacDonalds is not in the index, either intentionally or inadvertently omitted;

(c). The corporation is not called MacDonalds at all, but another name, in which case go back to the Head Office, or;

(d). The records have been removed (either by authority or stolen) or destroyed, or both.

Then to find out what they did, look at the books of Deeds (not just real estate deeds, every "deed" or "action" or "event") recorded in that courthouse under the true name of the corporation and in every other County Courthouse in which that corporation conducts or conducted its business.

Any way you look at it, to get at the real truth and to create an accurate history of what happened, you must "get to the bottom of it" and go to the courthouse to find the truth.

The "bones" of this book have been created from the sources as outlined in Clauses 1 through 5 above.

Where and when possible, and more particularly concerning the time period encompassing the early development of the United States of America to the present day, the "meat" on those bones has been provided from the real historic archives of the United States of America, namely the County and Municipal Courthouses and other similarly oriented depositories which present the legally admissible documentary proof of the main objective of this book, which is, simply stated, that:

This is chiefly an attempt to try to set the "record" of history straight, by showing you, the reader:

(1). How History has been written by the winners.

(2). That History is still, today, being written by the "winners" (Usurpers).

(3). That the History which the population has been taught in the schools is not the true History as reflected and proven in the Legal Record Books.

(4). That History is, unfortunately, still being repeated!

https://archive.org/stream/pdfy-jahQeqPP_0mKmwLr/The-Ultimate-Unseen-Hand-Behind-the-New-World-Order-666-Pandoras-BOX_djvu.txt