>>648037

Intriguing that it's them dropping the crumb.

Wonder who Pompeo has running their twatter.

Thank you Baker.

Who loves ya baby?

>>648255

Possibillty on meaning, not identity:

>>646260

>>646312

>>648286

Agree this is a setup. And the hounds are falling hook, line & sinker for it.

Bait meet hook.

>>648240

so P=Palestine and Flat Earth are in the dough but Admiral Roger's testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee is not. The head of the freakin NSA.

Un-fucking-believable.

>>648324

>>648374

>>648334

What if it's not identifying an individual but a particular process or strategy? Like DEFCON 1,2, etc.

>>648402

Thanks for bringing it to our attention. Makes metaphorical sense when you consider the subjects being discussed their sources outside the "conventional" history books.

Like an oral history for the digital age.