>>6482000 (LB)
>So, they're the falcons suggested by initial poster?
>
>(I'm standing by Phoenix for the moment, bc reasons.)
Unfortunately, IMO, we never got a definitive pic of them. Even the HD pics weren't conclusive as far as I am concerned. I understand very well that back during "pizzagate", that everyone settled on the idea that these TWO birds are the Phoenix, which makes no sense at all….for several reasons.
1)There are never two Phoenix present/alive at the same time, and we would have to venture to claim that the occultist's who decided on the symbology of the temple, would have known that the presence of two Phoenix would make no sense.
2) The Phoenix is rarely, if at all related to Aphrodite/Venus/Isis. And that is why I said to dig on the Burney Relief, as many scholars see that Lillith, Isis, Oestre, Astarte, Assurah, are all interchangeable.
3) The Burney Relief shows "the Queen of the Night" flanked by two owls, not a pair of Phoenix. Owls also tie directly to Pallas Athena and Minerva, which then ties into the Palladium Rite of Freemasonry, represented by an ARCH with a missing Keystone. Back in the #7200 breads, we even dug up a pic of the Palladium Arch that included both the missing Keystone with an owl present.
>>6481955 (LB)
>Who said anything about a Phoenix?
Maybe you should learn to read, as I clearly linked to, and referenced the crumb of the anon, who guessed that the birds are two Phoenix. But whatever…you are just butt swollen over your post being pointed out as grossly inaccurate, not well researched, and certainly not being NOTABLE worthy. Maybe you need to apply some of that ANusJEL G.