>>6484128 (LB)
>One more question if I may?
Sure thing. I am gonna be here for about 20 minutes more….got a few things to take care of…probably come back on Graveyard shift or a little earlier.
>How do we slow walk statism? Or will it not matter?
I think the question you are asking is "How do we slow walk statism (back into non-existence?)" I believe it was Barry Goldwater who once said that Government should be so small, that you could drown it in a bathtub.
That is my thinking as well. While we need the Government to regulate some aspects of industry (to prevent fraud, monopolies, racketeering), that trust which we empower the govenment with, should never, IMO, ultimately be allowed to mutate into the classical or Ayn Rand definition of Statism.
The Cabal and the DS almost manipulated this into being accepted, for example, when the Federal Government bailed out Chrysler, etc.
I said earlier, that Q and The Plan are unraveling 5+ decades of the Cabal's Plan, and even that is not technically accurate. We could go back further to the Trading with the Enemy Act, further yet to the establishment of the FEDRES. Further back to 1798…
The funny thing is, the further you go back into American history, the less control the Cabal had. Don't get me wrong…They have ALWAYS been in control, going back thousands of years.
But the point is, that going back, there was far more talk of Nationalism, and Statism was seen to be just as dangerous as the Socialist's "creeping Socialism"…because Statism, IMO, creeps into, and results in Fascism.