>what if Military Intelligence is doing the investigation of the [FBI]? And that is why Wray “doesn’t know” anything?
Have yet to see reports of the rank-and-file FBI being compromised. For what it’s worth FBIanon suggested the leadership was the issue, not the agents and seemed to imply agents were disgusted at the political protection surrounding HRC in 2016. Q also directly called out FBI individuals who’d been 86’d and all of them were in senior leadership positions. Finally Q’s also directly addressed the rank and file - think back to the “remember you oath” posts, which further suggests the underlings are /ourguys/. This not to say everyone at the FBI / DOJ / CIA / etc who’s not in a senior leadership position is good, just that the problem children we hear about are always at/close to the top.
Thinking logically my guess is the logistics of compromising the senior leadership of an organization is easier than compromising the entire organization itself. If one controlled or influenced the majority of the top twenty leaders of an organization / three-letter-agency, one could certainly exert influence, if not defacto control. Get rid of the compromised leaders, you get rid of the cancer.
As for the public sphere, appearances, and optics, Q has stated the biggest threat to us is the MSM. I read this as the MSM’s ability to dictate the narrative and shape how people perceive reality is the problem as the MSM can spin good to look like evil and evil to look like good.
This means if Trump/Q were to arrest the pedos TODAY, abolish the IRS / Income Tax TODAY, disband the FED TODAY, execute the traitors TODAY, it would be spun as bad. Bad, BAD, B-A-D! by MSM and ENOUGH would accept the MSMs false interpretation to react poorly to it.
(How many hidden stockpiles of weapons a-la that Gettysburg bust in LA last week are scattered around the county to facilitate violent riots if you can get people wound up enough?)
If MSM is the biggest threat to the American public and MSMs power comes from their credibility in the minds of their consumers, then removing that credibility is key to removing the threat.
By managing the optics of current events it 1.) uses MSM’s desire to embarrass Trump against itself (Trump’s such an idiot - look at him railing against Wray/Sessions/Rosenstein/etc. Quick! We must defend them!) by uniting the haters behind public figures who are really working for the plan. 2) it locks, or at least limits, the MSM narrative from drastic change. MSM’s power is based on credibility and making whipsaw changes to their narrative directly undermines their credibility. Therefore if the MSM is locked into a narrative which will ultimately benefit the plan, we win. If the MSM tries to change their narrative to avoid benefiting the plan and lose credibility as a result, we still win.