Sorry for the repost Baker, but this might be key and would really like some daytime anons to consider. It could totally be wrong, but moar eyes looking at the posts from this perspective can't hurt. We've already got many of the news stories and docs paired up with posts - need people that have read/compared actual cited proof vs. "muh sources" proof. The example is obviously a partial proof because the story is not done playing out until the indictments for such things roll out. Of course, this would explain the military tribunals. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/WebART/380-600073?OpenDocument
ANONS - I think we've got the comms figured out.
example: post 3330
Chain of Command is a book on by Seymour Hersh - talks about the abuse that our soldiers were putting innocent people through for the "war". Abu Ghraib x1000 - It's no surprise that they hate us after what we did to civilians.
Chain of custody - we can find where we've been lied to about this by comparing documents vs. fake news.
Pence CoS & wife - the fake news they're using to cover for Flynn?
FBI 302's is the fake news method.
The FISA (spy) story is apparently NOT bigger than Flynn - if this is the case.
Will the Barr SDNY info free Flynn or prove crimes?
I also think that POTUS is showing us where we can find the fake news sources for posts without them and/or the source of the documents to prove that what was reported is fake news.