>>6488357

when taken?

>>6488462

bill clinton killed pebble bed reactors

I think anon needs to read up on those before spouting off more

>>6488596

that wasn't a pebble bed reactor now was it?

>>6488636

instead of solar/wind which are laughable

hydro would be ok if available in enough places but infrastructure intensive

burnables–ok

now you might want to go look up pebble bed reactors

you may learn something instead of being scared away from it by the cabal fake news for 70 years

seriously, why kill off pebble bed reactors? hmm why the constant scare of nuclear energy since 3 mile island nothingburger

use your mind anon