Anonymous ID: d5b855 May 13, 2019, 10:03 a.m. No.6488282   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8326 >>8757 >>8880

Lysdexia Anyone? Or is it MOAR?

Dig on Scientology Coords and Pics gives 2 other locations.

>>6486952 (PB)

>>6486998 (PN)

>>6487027 (PN)

>>6487274 (PN)

 

Something isn't adding up with these Scientology coordinates.

The first 3 pictures each have coordinates as file names. They're all the same set. It's the set for the first image, I think, only image 1 is flipped compared to the coordinates.

 

When the coordinates are posted in blackout in a response, only the first set matches the image sequence (it's only off by a few meters).

The second set is to another Scientology compound, BUT IT'S NOT THE SAME AS IMAGE 2. IT'S AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LOCATION.

Same with image 3. Another Scientology compound; COMPLETELY DIFFERENT LOCATION.

 

So where DAFUQ are these 2 images from, anons?

Also, the first image is PNG, while the other 2 are jpeg, and the first black box set is in decimal format, while the other 2 are in degrees minutes and seconds. Because of these anomalies, I wonder if there isn't more hidden in this…

 

I subtracted image 3 decimals from image 2 decimals and got a resulting location in Africa, but the rest above my autist grade. All 3 in both formats are below if anyone wants to play with it, and if anyone knows how to extract hidden png info, that would also be helpful.

35° 31' 22.9836"N -104° 34' 27.7638"W

35.523051, -104.574379

40°23'15.55"N 124°18'19.05"W

40.387653 124.305292

35°27'12.29"N 120°29'59.20"W

35.453414 120.499778

Anonymous ID: d5b855 May 13, 2019, 10:11 a.m. No.6488339   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8364

>>6488326

What can't you comprehend?

In a previous notable 3 images are linked with 3 coordinate sets, except two of them don't go to 2 of the images. We have a total of 5 locations and coordinates for 3, but you actually have to enter said coordinates to figure that out. It doesn't seem like anyone did.

Anonymous ID: d5b855 May 13, 2019, 11:29 a.m. No.6488953   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8974

>>6488880

I see that now. Thanks.

Do you think image 2 is hiding around there somewhere?

 

pic 4 was me overthinking it. (difference between decimal conversion of coordinate sets 3 and 2)