Assume you noticed this already baker but I just got here, was looking up top--there's needs to be a post # for #8299 in dough, here it is:
>>6490527 #8299
ps, love the "pot meet kettle" ref in AOC post LB, kek.
wow, I replied to your post last night and just got on the board just now, and here's your reply to me….
have you searched around QResearch to see what you could find? I used a couple search terms to pull up the vid I talked about last night but you could try others. Kind of challenging wo/a link but you might find something.
The notables pages stuck when you were baking? Weird. Never had that happen. Did you have to start over? (in case it comes up for me….GYB)
Sounds like big changes coming to catholicism, mebbe no surprise to anyone here, given when we see. (I pay attn to dreams, too, when they "stick"–like the dream about a giant__ bread making__ place 15 years ago, kek.)
Thanks, good tip on the last minute notes. Lets baker add em without having to repost, just ran into that problem last night. Good notable but not enough time to add it and also repost (especially with captcha).
Not getting something notabled is not censorship. Anyone can post here. Mostly, it's the community that determines what is notable, based upon Q drops and how the community interprets them. Bakers cannot really put stuff in Notables that community rejects; likewise, community asks for notables on stuff they judge to be of widespread interest.
Generally speaking, the most noteworthy material is breaking news on stuff of direct relevance to QResearch and that is particularly emphasized by Q (FFs, CP, POTUS/Congressional habbenings, DNC, Clintons, border policies, election fuckery, etc.).