https://www.bostonherald.com/2018/05/31/shouting-match-between-attorneys-ex-mob-boss-brings-quick-end-to-days-proceedings/

even though the trial was in Providence, it may also relate back to the Boston Office of the > >

the murder victim was a theif and not a rat. how did the Providence guys get information telling them otherwise?

who gave them data to that effect, which was incorrect, and made them put out a hit on a man who was not guilty of violating the 'no rat' code? (Dissario was not a rat).

Who gave misinformation to the Providence people to make them think that Dissario was a rat?

Durham might know all about it.

Maybe that, too, will become relevant in coming weeks in relationship to those who were running that Boston office of the three-letter-agency.