Backward and Forward.

Look behind Bill Clinton.

Not just who follows (on the tarmac).

Not just who follows BC.

Who is behind Bill Clinton?

Who is funding? Who is campaign manager?

Whose funder? Whose manager?

Not just Amanda Renteria.

Double meanings are important. Some diisformation is necessary.

The Tarmac Meeting may have been a distraction deliberately staged by Bill Clinton.

Think of the mistaken strategy of wanting to run against DJT. Too clever by far. Backfired. Same on the tarmac?

If the meeting itself is not the golden nugget, what is beyond the surface of the tarmac?

Russ Limbaugh reported a 3rd plane. t was in this plane (SCIF) that the players met to play political goal. A hole in one is a rarity. Think Billigans both assumed and on offer.

Godspeed Anons

>>6493125

Rush Limbaugh.

>>6493154

>>6493162

The public accounting of the tarmac meeting – by LL and by BC – are steeped in double meanings. They imagine themselves to be far more clever than they are now being shown to be in the light that Q has shed on their behaviors.

Talk of golf = playing the political game.

For instance, Billigans.

Assumed by BC as he plays but also on offer to those who play with him (or against him).

Special kind of do-over. Deal. Make a mistake and then here is how to fix it.

Talk of mining in West Virginia = Which Side Are You On? (See Q Research for details).

Talk of 1932 = reference to Supreme Court decision of that court season which hinged on intent. See BO's public pronouncement on HRC intent. See Comey's predrawn conclusion on intent.

Apply Billigan.

When BC golfs, who is behind BC?

What is a bridge, in political golf?

What does it mean to manage the heat?

They have been engaging in subversive comms in plain sight – evein in OIG reports (not just press conferences and press interviews). Consistency sharpens the under-the-surface messages.

Messages of INTENT.

In 1932 there was a major mining disaster, Poncahontas = message about avoiding a disaster with AG and SC nomination process.

Recently detailed in breads. QReserach.

Cheers, Anons.

>>6493239

What does it mean when a political operative reassures the Boss that he can land this plane?

Think 9-11 and a different commitment, to not land a plane, and training for something else.

Now, if the plan is already landed and waiting, what is the message of intent? Forget words. Think of a chessboard. Think of the emphasis on political triangulation (navigation) that BC made famous – made his name as master of political practices (winning). Combine this with his method of dangling shiny objects for those behind him (followers), those beneath him (opponents), and those who fly above him (power behind the throne). Why did HRC not ground BC?

Now in contrast to BC's reputation as master politician, HRC's reputation is based on grounding opponents and "followers" alike. No neutrality is tolerable. One way or the other you must get in line behind HRC?

Any deal-making with LL and associates would have been dependant on BC's Billigans and on BC's cred to get tough nominations through confirmation process. HRC's promises would be empty if not for Bill. But trustworthy – either one?

LL talking. Comey tried to throw her under the bus. Look behind BC.

Q may have been warning playeres to watch their backs. Who has your six? Who has BC's back?

>>6493154

>>6493162

>>6493172

Both LL and BC may have been summoned.

Switch focus from what was said to what the presence of 3 jets would mean.

First, to LL. Second, to BC, Third to who is close behind BC.

If the Clintons planned on a dynasty, of sorts, who would be close behind BC's presidency?

Now, just the presence of a third plane may be freighted with meaning. But consider it not being reported – even in the Observer. Conside rit not being questioned, even in OIG Report (to-date). What if this 3rd plane is disinformation meant to convey a double meaning? Not communicated by Dems nor by Repubs – nor by Q, yet.

How would report of a 3rd jet have the greatest impact on any of these players? On Anons? On the Q movement?

Trusted as a bridge. Do bridges fly? What is the utility of a bridge? If it was not on your map, would you plan to cross it?

Next, a review of Q Post 2938.

How do you repair a bridge without closing it down?

Without closing it down. Double meaning.

Cheers Anons.

Q >>6493550

Tippy Top, Anon.

Building blocks.

What is the purpose of a BRIDGE?

Musically.

Connective tissue, biologically.

Structurally? Over(come) obstacles.

Moar.

Tonight, reviewing Q Post 2938. Connects many dots in many series of plots.

>>6493534

TY fren.

Never give up.