Anonymous ID: 3f44c8 May 14, 2019, 2:03 a.m. No.6494495   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4510

(from last bread)

 

I did sort of feel my way to three(?) MacLeod's:

 

  1. There must have been a MacLeod tooling around the area BEFORE 1700 for the name to appear around that date as one of the royal families names. There is also a Princess Overbeck of Austria involved.

 

  1. MacLeod appears later (18th) and emphatically as well and and is now associated with an adoption in the royal house by one grandmother macleod.

 

both one and two though are consistent in they say there WAS a MacLeod in the name of the royal family of the Philippines before 1800 and no one disputes thatโ€ฆand not only thatโ€ฆit seems that this family is actually the richest family in the world except for all the crooks that wont let them realize possession.

 

  1. This one is the stinker with one anonymous teller of the tale - Victoria had a twin brother. They were both born on a boat crossing to England. Anything else is a cover story. The twin is eventually dispatched to the straits settlement and he ends up in north borneo which is also owned by this Filipino family and ought to be part of the Philippines to this day. he had the name MacLeod. No idea when he took it or why. It doesn't sound like much now, but this is HUGE business so far I can find no record of him in the company records or any newspapers or books they all talk about this Dent fellow and his connections. The North borneo companies emblems could be MacLeod derived but that doesn't answer the question why would Victoria's unacknowledged twin take the name in the first place? It gets worse? because this story also includes Adolf Hitler and Japanese gold. and Adolf did not die in Argentina or Berlinโ€ฆbut in the Philippines. Really nigga?

 

However, if 3 never existed, it still leaves the MacLeods in the royal family long long before Victoria was even conceived.

 

The problem with 3 is the person that had this information is otherwise sane and trustworthy. I don't know if I should publish it because it could do damage to that which is 100% true.