or a former Superfund site?
Some of it is definitely the people's fault.
Whoa…
So, he's got a few conflicts wrt the Q thing, huh?
Like, um, significant conflicts.
Asharq Al-Awsat stands out the most to me
>What if the presidential alert was/will be the cryptography key to the wikileaks archive
I admire your very active imagination, man.
Wasn't there a minor news release a few months ago from MIT or Boston Laboratories regarding the success of "sending a particle backwards in time" for, like, a fraction of a second or something?
I know I should have saved the article…
Ah! Now I remember! They were able to move the (simulated) particle back a fraction of a second.
I think?
Wrt to the gold: Something like that rings a bell.
I think?
Because there was something I came across that gave me brief pause and was like "Ok, maybe there's something to the alchemy-thing".
>>6494598 (pb)
Thought I'd repost it, bc "interesting".
I am about to go physics nerd for a moment.
Consider a Bose Einstein Condensate. That is a search term to study if you aren't familiar.
Consider a chess board.
We can watch how a Bose-Einstein condensate "decoheres" in a causal cascade from when energy is injected into a system.
A chess board exists in a closed room. You open the door and observe the pieces arranged on it. From the state of the board, a certain number of possible future and past moves exist. Of these possibilities, many of them become "coherent" - whereby the exact order of turns or what pieces move when is functionally identical to the current outcome, and therefore can't be determined.
Close the door. The pieces are re-arranged. Open the door again. Between those two times exist a range of possibilities. Some of them are absolute. Others are not.
Define an integer.
An integer is a value which is complete or whole.
Define One.
The integer value which is complete and denotes a singular instance that can't be divided or expressed as a partial.
We know from QM that events in the future can influence events in the past…. And that quantum mechanics does weird things. For example, how does a wave or particle of light know the dimensions of a lens or prism it passes through? It is as though a particle of light passes through the whole of the crystal… Yet it could have only taken one path, and in the instance of very large crystals - we must question if our understanding of locality is relevant.
Anyway - back to the chess board. Let's say that there is a judge in the room who will occasionally reference a prior move. Each move he declares to have occurred imposes an entropic cost against the coherent possibilities. Declaring that a queen took a pawn in the first five turns after you closed the door forever removes that pawn from the possibilities. Whereas declaring that the king was in check by a certain piece at turn 30 poses a different cost on possibilities. The more detail, the higher the cost.
Eventually, the judge will no longer have a very open palette of moves to choose from, and the details begin to resolve into a game.
Do the positions of grains of dust on mars have any relevance to our lives? QM suggests that the universe would favor abstracting such unnecessary detail.
What is the history of a civilization on another planet that we encounter in our travels 3,000 years from now?
Future proves past.
And by repost I mean copy/paste something someone else said.
They haven't divorced, have they?