>>6494445

Okay…

So, I am sure that is either a photoshop or some weird as hell disease…

But I am sure you are aware this is the look of the Japanese "Oni."

What is interesting is that it has become extremely popular in anime/manga to associate this image with extraterrestrial or extradimensional beings.

"Darwin's Game," for example, seems to be using them as a parallel world's dominant anthropod. The manga, itself, is about the (perhaps misguided) attempts of a man to rapidly evolve humanity so as to deal with these invaders or some sort of dimensional collision.

More on that in a minute.

Naruto, obviously, used them for the Otsutsuki - the beings behind the legend of Kaguya-Hime, and the Boruto series seems to try and deal with that issue… But meh.

Back onto the subject of aliens, invaders, and forced evolution… Westwood Studios, back in the 90s, created a very interesting series by the name of Command&Conquer. It is later revealed that the leader of the Brotherhood of NOD, Kane, is likely some form of alien being who has been trying to forcibly evolve humanity … The purpose seems simply to use them as a tool against his people - but it resonates with the concept of Kaguya's bizarre actions in the Natuto series, if we are coupling symbolism.

On Mueller, RR, Sessions, POTUS, etc:

Mueller is in a very important position for all of this. Do not think in terms of "white hat/black hat" - it will confuse your thinking.

Mueller was necessary to keep the Special Council reigned in. Timing is everything, and Mueller made sure the SC remained under the control of timing. If the SC finished up too early, the Democrats would have forced reports from the SC that favored their position before the court cases regarding those issues could be cleared up. Not only could this create problems for witness testimony in ongoing investigations, it would also allow the democrats to run their staged narratives to launch more investigations into selectively reported events and control public perception.

"But ArmC4," you say, "Mueller is saving himself…."

This is part of the true genius in this script. Mueller will be indicted for his role in Uranium One.

What if Mueller knew then that someone would be coming in the future to indict him for his role in what his superiors were doing?

Also consider what Posobiec said. Contrary to what some have expressed, Posobiec has been privy to some insider knowledge and he has built up a persona deliberately for the purposes of distributing, in a selective manner, information to control their perception. Disinformation is best served as selectively true. Mueller did sign for the rooms of the 9/11 hijackers.

Why would the head of the FBI sign for rooms, though? The CIA charter forbids the CIA to operate inside the U.S. anything they do inside the U.S. must be approved (or is supposed to be - they only report it when it suits their interests, however).

If you know the name Hassan Al Banna, then you likely know that Al Qaeda is a byproduct of his organization and Operation Cyclone - IE - the CIA created their own plausibly deniable force. The Mujahideen were the Muslim Brotherhood congress had just cought on to the fact the CIA had nazi operatives (the MB) on their payroll. MI5 transfered them over to the OSS before the formation of the CIA - which MI5 blamed on a Russian double-agent when Congress wanted to know what the fuck that was about. It should be noted that the British bankrolled Operation Cyclone and directly supported it with Radio Kabul.

Anyway - the CIA would have run a request to have the FBI house some of their operatives stateside, for reasons. This approval would have gone through the upper levels of the FBI. Hence why Mueller signed for the rooms of the 9/11 hijackers.

Again - keep in mind that Mueller knew someone would be coming along to investigate all of this. What if, say, Mueller filed numerous mandates to investigate things that were ignored - both up and down the chain of command?

Of course, the only way any of what really happened will come out is of President Trump remains king of the hill and can keep control over the power of classifying/declassifying information. He holds the nuclear button in that regard and there are those in the agencies who would comply with the executive branch declaring all archives to no longer be classified. The President has that authority if he so desired.

What if the presidential alert was/will be the cryptography key to the wikileaks archive?

Every possibility must be prepared for. I am simply expressing roughly how I would have structured things. If the President says "nothing is classified anymore" - and the agencies do not comply, then this would trigger a plan B that was far more damning. And I would make sure my enemies were able to fear that possibility. "-But it has no point if you keep it a secret-WHY DIDN'T YOU TELL THE WORLD!?"

>>6494526

Precisely. I observed this pattern in Colbert and Stewart, as well. I didn't time it - but I did notice the way it flowed. This is identical to how "the left" will engage debates in social media. They will almost always groupie (perhaps with bots - depends on the platform and exactly who you are engaging) and use the like/laugh reactions manipulatively. They will like each other's comments and laugh at yours. They also love animated .gifs of eye-rolls and other such things.

These are all designed to manipulate a person into feeling isolated and alone while trying to discuss a topic. They also love to promote the idea that discussion on various platforms should almost never be serious and never of consequence - this tries to lure bystanders in to 'have fun' with them at prodding the person who is over-reacting.

>>6494580

If President Trump were to pardon Mueller, it would be the worst blunder he could possibly make. Headline:

"President Trump PARDONS HIS INVESTIGATOR." That would GUARANTEE multiple investigations by the Democrats and public support for them.

As for the rest of what Posobiec is saying - I take it with the understanding that he is a CIA affiliated plant who uses his limited role in the military to build a character for the public.

While I won't claim to be radically different from him in terms of use of character - I am… A bit more like one who doesn't close the curtains on my antics in the mirror, fully aware there are potentially viewers and more than a few owls come by to see what I'm up to from time to time.

Sometimes, it takes a bit of arrogance to see what is going on. When you assume you are unimportant and small, then you close your mind to the possibilities of greatness. Either way - I turn my daily trip to the store into a quest to save humanity, so I am perpetually entertained.

>>6494592

Anata bakka?

Why would Mueller know what the CIA was planning? Basic operational compartmentalization ensures this. It's not exactly hard to scope you all out, you know. The big story is that the AQ hijackers were working with the CIA for their operation to destroy the towers… And you are salivating over slamming Mueller in jail.

Is there some kind of a glow in the dark paint oven they send you guys through?

>>6494598

I am about to go physics nerd for a moment.

Consider a Bose Einstein Condensate. That is a search term to study if you aren't familiar.

Consider a chess board.

We can watch how a Bose-Einstein condensate "decoheres" in a causal cascade from when energy is injected into a system.

A chess board exists in a closed room. You open the door and observe the pieces arranged on it. From the state of the board, a certain number of possible future and past moves exist. Of these possibilities, many of them become "coherent" - whereby the exact order of turns or what pieces move when is functionally identical to the current outcome, and therefore can't be determined.

Close the door. The pieces are re-arranged. Open the door again. Between those two times exist a range of possibilities. Some of them are absolute. Others are not.

Define an integer.

An integer is a value which is complete or whole.

Define One.

The integer value which is complete and denotes a singular instance that can't be divided or expressed as a partial.

We know from QM that events in the future can influence events in the past…. And that quantum mechanics does weird things. For example, how does a wave or particle of light know the dimensions of a lens or prism it passes through? It is as though a particle of light passes through the whole of the crystal… Yet it could have only taken one path, and in the instance of very large crystals - we must question if our understanding of locality is relevant.

Anyway - back to the chess board. Let's say that there is a judge in the room who will occasionally reference a prior move. Each move he declares to have occurred imposes an entropic cost against the coherent possibilities. Declaring that a queen took a pawn in the first five turns after you closed the door forever removes that pawn from the possibilities. Whereas declaring that the king was in check by a certain piece at turn 30 poses a different cost on possibilities. The more detail, the higher the cost.

Eventually, the judge will no longer have a very open palette of moves to choose from, and the details begin to resolve into a game.

Do the positions of grains of dust on mars have any relevance to our lives? QM suggests that the universe would favor abstracting such unnecessary detail.

What is the history of a civilization on another planet that we encounter in our travels 3,000 years from now?

Future proves past.

>>6494685

It's to be expected.

Imagine teams carrying torches through night and rain with assassins in any bush. Those who have been charged with that task are going to be … Edgy and rather distrusting. Many of them would have forgotten what daylight looked like or may have even begun to completely misunderstand why they were carrying that torch in the first place.

Getting everyone on the same page will take a bit of time, and also a little bit of compelling force - which POTUS/Q seems intent on providing.

>>6494717

Any sufficiently advanced means is indistinguishable from magic.

Force comes in many different forms.

https://youtu.be/2ngN3687KJE

Morning sun brings heat.

>>6494686

https://youtu.be/Wn6FxIikS-Q

You really need to learn how to read symbolism. While you have been smearing western media with the sewers and insulting us…

>>6494805

I have some issued with the global consciousness project's methods - but they have been willing to at least probe a bit at the bounds of physics.

On the topic of Q, the first Star Trek episode I saw with Q involved the issue of "time travel."

https://youtu.be/LrpcJh7SNwo

>>6494900

You seem to think that there is a battle for you to win, here.

I have told you what is and what will be. You will be compelled to accept it by the fact it transpires.

The reason you are trying to make a big issue and argument about the nature of Mueller is because you need panic among the conservative activists and the hope that someone will jump the gun and commit to some form of violence you can use to flip the table.

This is the end of this discussion.

>>6494907

They are going to try and spin it as if there is something within the Mueller report that Barr covered up and there needs to be an investigation into obstruction.

To be fair, most of the Mueller Report was written by the Special Council.

The thing that the Democrats were hoping for was being able to spin the events contained within as being evidence of "collusion." Whatever legal charge that isn't.

The thing is that there is a "but when you consider this…." To most of what is in Mueller's report. Timing is everything. Other cases need to be able to release their findings to give a more complete context of what the SC focused on in their report.

For example… Why was Manafort under investigation before his role in the Trump Campaign and how is it that three people under FISA warrants were all employed in the Trump campaign? Seems outside the standard deviation, no?

>>6494964

Again, it is as though you think there is a battle to be won. You are trying to argue events and decisions outside your realm of control. My decree has no more weight than your own. Why? Because there is a thing called discovery in the court of law.

There are things that you do not know. There are things I think I know. That is what courts are for.

In a single document release, your entire premise can be swept away and all of your 'evidence' changed in its entirety.

Who is more honest? The man who stands in the street and proclaims himself to be God, or the man who stands with a book proclaiming to have the proper interpretation of God's words?

>>6495049

You forgot that 'we' like theater.

Greek tragedy was known for engaging the audience with each character as relatable. Each one was often a philosophy given flesh and allowed to act out that philosophy to the absolute destruction of the character.

You also forget that the destruction must be complete and the pill must be easy to swallow.

Truly master chess players use their opponent's pieces against them.

>>6495045

The devil, as they say, is in the details.

Sometimes the decision in a court case - particularly a supreme court case - can have far reaching implications.

On the surface, it appears simple to rule one way or another - but in the greater context…

"They" will try to stack the docket with cases they think the court will rule favorably on. Thus - when a conservative majority is in, they will put forth as many cases as possible that conservatives will rule for/against as "they" would like the cases to be ruled.

I am not going to pretend to know that one, but I will say that is what I would look at.