>>6495263

>an article that explains her as being on 'our' side

but that wouldn't and couldn't prove anything

just an opinion.

i thought the focus on all the "follow Huma" quotes in early crumbs was an interesting angle.

but /ourguy-gal/ debates are useless anyway, as long as we're supposed to be in doubt

>>6495294

they can remote kill with cars.

they can do it with planes since at least 9/11

>>6495324

> they found it. it blew up in mid air and they have known all along.

interesting.

but isn't that because of the patent/tech team kills the crash was for?