not sure how a baker can "self-nominate" 19 out of 22 notables. that means that the baker would have to post the content, then nom the content and include as notable.
I took a quick look at the past notables on the board which shows that is a BS argument and easy to prove as such.
Sounds like the anon needs to learn how to bake if panties are in that big of a wad.
agreed that sometimes its easier to grab the sauce yourself, but it's not realistic to say that your would do it 19 times in a single bread. Bakers go thru nearly each post (shill posting aside) and don't have the bandwidth to do that much notable homework.
just my 2 cents.
bakers volunteer to capture information that is relevant to the qresearch board, digs, articles, anon theories, etc…
as long as it pertains to qresearch and is original, it should be a notable. nothing more or less.
i have been here a while and have seen a rogue baker now and again, but not often. we have a pretty good group of bakers here (live bake baker not withstanding) help archive information for the Q movement.