Can take it baker, thanks for the bake
Handoff Confirmed?
Understood anon, thanks.
Said this earlier, it used to be only nominated posts that were 'notable' and should be at the top of the bread for anons that missed that bread so they can catch up.
With fewer nominations, bakers have been adding anything missed, and if someone nominates it after the baker collected it, that's good; if an anon refutes it for a good reason it should be removed imo.
I try to add BOTH nominated and missed digs, graphics, theories, news, and other 'notable' and relevant posts.
Anons' and bakers' feedback on bakers and baking should always happen; good for checks and balances. Again, thanks for your thoughts on this.
imo, yup
anons theorized that when the news about him investigating leaks came out early this year.
Notables so far
#8314
>>6501484 Rosenstein slams Comey for becoming a 'partisan pundit'
>>6501486 Representative Rochelle Galindo Resigns Amid Sexual Misconduct Claim
>>6501536 Sex Cult Sponsor Made Illegal Donations to Hillary Clinton's Campaign
>>6501608 Nancy Pelosi Attempts To Give Mother’s Day Presser; Leaves Everyone Worried Over Her Well-Being
————————————————-
You're right anon.
What I mean by that is anons nominated posts, and it was the baker's discretion on what to add and not add, but it was primarily what anons nominated from what I've observed on /qresearch/.
Frenly Reminder:
Nominate digs, research, graphics, news, theories, discussion, and other relevant posts so the baker can add it.
Anons can help bakers by adding a title or description to the nomination like this:
>>####### [Title/Description of the post]
NOTABLE
Thanks anons, o7
>What is the reason for you bringing it up again here
I literally replied to an anon: >>6501525
I didn't bring it up, just responding to an anon's thoughts.
>That's not the case anon
Kek, anons don't nominate posts? They should be, when I started baking (and from what I saw well before I started) I would basically add nominated posts that anons felt should be in the notables part of the dough for other anons to see, dig on further, and spread. I don't like when clearly notable posts don't get nominated, but they should be in notables so bakers now add them so they don't get missed for other anons.
> I saw you post the same gripes earlier today and you were given good explanations of how the bakers bake here
>Bakers collect notable research, digs, additions to digs, past q posts, connections, graphics, side x sides and relevant news so that anons who missed some breads can catch up.
>If you don't feel that the notables reflect what you want to see, either suggest some to the baker or go back to that thread and catch up for yourself. Easy.
And that's what I said again.
The anon was commenting on how many posts are added without nominations by bakers, and I was responding to those specific thoughts.
Thanks anon.
Oh ok no problem and thanks anon, happy to talk about it anyway.
I try to answer any questions anons have about baking when I can.
Notables so far
#8314
>>6501484 Rosenstein slams Comey for becoming a 'partisan pundit'
>>6501486 Representative Rochelle Galindo Resigns Amid Sexual Misconduct Claim
>>6501536 Sex Cult Sponsor Made Illegal Donations to Hillary Clinton's Campaign
>>6501608 Nancy Pelosi Attempts To Give Mother’s Day Presser; Leaves Everyone Worried Over Her Well-Being
>>6501717 Anon's theory: If C(omey) comes before D(eclas), does B(rennan) comes before C(omey)?
>>6501744 China April industrial output cools, retail sales growth falls to 16-yr low
————————————————-
That's already in notables, but if you archive it I'll add it.
I gotcha anon.
>The nominations evolved much later
This is what I'm referring to, it's a system that's worked really well imo. There seems to be a lot of anons that are used to that system too and I think that's what the OP was talking about. It's always and constantly evolving, but good standards are definitely a good thing for bakers (and anons too).
hmmmm
multiple videos? an archive site?
>Even a Notable Nominated Notable may not further the mission (sorry, it's true)
No no no, I don't think I was clear enough in my post, I didn't mean that EVERY nominated post is notable, THAT'S where the discernment comes in. Shills will nominate their own posts sometimes KEK.
I was just commenting on what I noticed about how many posts get nominated vs how many are added because, like you said, "A Baker sort of owes it to anons catching up to capture notable notables". I noticed many less posts get nominated by anons, so bakers pick up posts that are still relevant that are missed.
All I meant, always willing to discuss baking.
Thanks for the bakes, baker, and hope you continue!
Gotcha anon, thanks and you too.
LAST CALL
#8314
>>6501484 Rosenstein slams Comey for becoming a 'partisan pundit'
>>6501486 Representative Rochelle Galindo Resigns Amid Sexual Misconduct Claim
>>6501536 Sex Cult Sponsor Made Illegal Donations to Hillary Clinton's Campaign
>>6501608 Nancy Pelosi Attempts To Give Mother’s Day Presser; Leaves Everyone Worried Over Her Well-Being
>>6501717 Anon's theory: If C(omey) comes before D(eclas), does B(rennan) comes before C(omey)?
>>6501744 China April industrial output cools, retail sales growth falls to 16-yr low
It was just encouraged that notables reflected what anons thought should be in there as a hivemind. Great description: >>6501954
Honestly, that amerimutt shit looked kinda ridiculous too me.
Thanks though anon.
I try to get sauce for everything I can.
If it's a theory or discussion, it might not apply but sauce is always good to have when it can be added to a post.
>bakers are free to add posts to the notes without anon nom noms as long as it's properly sauced material and relevant to the work..
yup
#8314
>>6501484 Rosenstein slams Comey for becoming a 'partisan pundit'
>>6501486 Representative Rochelle Galindo Resigns Amid Sexual Misconduct Claim
>>6501536 Sex Cult Sponsor Made Illegal Donations to Hillary Clinton's Campaign
>>6501608 Nancy Pelosi Attempts To Give Mother’s Day Presser; Leaves Everyone Worried Over Her Well-Being
>>6501717 Anon's theory: If C(omey) comes before D(eclas), does B(rennan) comes before C(omey)?
>>6501744 China April industrial output cools, retail sales growth falls to 16-yr low
>>6502104 Lindsey Graham may not 'back off' FISA abuse probe after all
>>6502119 Side by side on Isaac Kappy's suicide: "Think Bridge"