>>6503884 (pb)
Not necessarily. They could have both been dirty, but one flipped and one didn't. Or both flipped. The next question would be, why were they dirty if they were dirty? Willing or non willing?
What's up with the wig on this guy?
>>6503884 (pb)
Not necessarily. They could have both been dirty, but one flipped and one didn't. Or both flipped. The next question would be, why were they dirty if they were dirty? Willing or non willing?
What's up with the wig on this guy?